On 04/23/2010 12:05 PM, William Jon McCann wrote:
Or maybe its just that spins as they are defined now aren't such
good idea. They don't really have the flexibility to define and
design their own experience. The difference between GNOME and KDE for
example, to the user, is nearly as great as the difference between
Windows and OS X. Spins are each different operating systems with
diverging not converging experiences and goals. We have a development
architecture that forces agreement or artificial commonality between
very different things and it is no surprise that we have a lot of
As far as I see alot of this conflicts can be traced back to not
involving all parties which looks like has happened with this thread
here ( Updates next steps and this being discussed on the desktop list
). The other major issue is that the Fedora project in whole has a
"Default" as it sides with one application or group of application over
another which shadows development and work efforts of others.
Projects are not allowed competing amongst themselves on even ground
which not only hinders their development efforts but also the growth of
the community surrounding + it also hinders further enhancements in the
project themselves on all sides which would come through competing
application advancing themselves to get the small extra edge over the
project it's competing against.
Hey we even don't let competing desktop project being able to work their
way up to become the so called "Default" or choose a new one each
release cycle so no carrot there to try to improve community efforts and
growth around those projects....
Chrisoph Wickert "spins suck"
Kevin Kofler "Let’s fight together against GNOME-centricism in Fedora!"
Look, creating a compelling operating is real fucking hard. No,
seriously, really really super fucking really hard. If we devote all
of our energy and time into creating one operating system we probably
can't even pull it off. But we certainly can't pull it off if we have
4 different operating systems stepping on each other toes, getting in
each other grill, sucker punching, and begrudging. No way. Honestly,
even if we manage to widen our community (remember Fedora is just one
small part of the larger open source community, folks) to include
other projects with similar goals and all work on one thing we'll have
a really difficult struggle on our hands. But the good kind of
struggle - creative struggle - not the destructive struggle we
currently have in Fedora. Like Kevin, I want to fight too. But
unlike Kevin, I want to fight to create something monumental - a
tribute to open source. Something that can demonstrate to the world
that we can. The other kind of fighting - is mud. And the rest of
the world understandably walks right past it.
Their and others frustration is understandable after being treated like
second hand Fedora citizens and that frustration will exist until the
Fedora project reaches that point which it inevitably will and stops
siding with one project over the other and removes the "Default" label.
You must realize that your vision maybe that there exist only one Linux
Desktop and it's called Gnome, their vision is the same it's just called
KDE LXDE XFCE etc.. It's the very nature of Open Source to reinvent the
wheel and "Fork off!" so there will never be only one ( Pidgin vs
Empathy, Rhytmbox vs Exaile. Totem vs mplayer vlc xine etc ). However
that does not mean that people cant work together help each other out in
the need of coding thou their projects may differ but unfortunately I
dont think that kind of collaboration will start to happen until the
label "Default" ( which perhaps had a meaningful existence here back in
the day when floppy disks roamed the earth and bandwidth was scarce ) is
removed from the Fedora Project and that hatchet be buried forever...