On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:

We should probably arrange it so that both the Workstation and Server
products follow the same approach for dealing with comps.

Absolutely. Care to ask the Server WG how are they going to name their comps?
I know it sounds like bikeshedding, but we can't really proceed without a name,
and changing the name later might be problematic.

I think that the most ideal setup would be to have one group named fedora-workstation and another named fedora-server.

In my ideal
world, it would be possible during a net install for us to have a
single high-level package selection in Anaconda that was:

* Fedora Workstation
* Fedora Server
* Fedora Custom (Leading to the traditional dialogs).

Thoughts?

In my opinion we don't need to change the current Anaconda UI like you're suggesting:

Workstation will be installed from Live where you don't have package selection, while Server will be installed (probably) from DVD.

We can have the DVD default to Server, and people could still change it in the current Anaconda software selection, or however the Server WG wants to handle this.

-Elad Alfassa.