On 11/18/2014 09:44 AM, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Tue Nov 18 2014 at 3:16:09 PM Paul W. Frields <stickster@gmail.com> wrote:
(1) The SRPM in the bug appears to be *newer* than git (includes
e.g. prefs.js, control utility).  Maybe something wasn't pushed?

Yes, the snapshot was from my local tree. The prefs was a late-night hack from the previous night, and I wanted to get at least some minimum feedback that those options made sense.

If I can read this as a confirmation, I'll push the commits in question.

 
(2) [...] Also, from the mockups, an < 100% opacity was desirable. 

 Will this be handled by the artwork, or do we want another option?


(3) The package needs a .gschema.override file to point to the new
logo.  That seems like the right thing to do for a distro-specific
change like this.

Yes, that was the idea. 


If the opacity can be done in the extension, that would work better IMHO, that way we can ship an SVG in the fedora-logos package that has no transparency (in case it needs to be used elsewhere)

cheers,
ryanlerch