Hi Josh,
Ok, I posted on the FeSCO ticket, but I will also try to attend
the next FeSCO meeting about the subject. I am a bit surprised
FeSCO is assuming it would be their job to approve repos
considering the council approved proposal clearly states that the 3rd party
repos as a working group issue.
Christian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org>
> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop"
<desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:28:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Procedure for dealing with 3rd party applications
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Christian Schaller <cschalle(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Workstation Working Group,
> > So now that that Council finalized on the 3rd party software proposal in a
> > positive way
> > (
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1617)
>
> That's the FESCo ticket. The Council ticket is:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57
>
> > we need to figure out the details on how we want to approach this as a
> > working group.
> > As mentioned in previous discussions and in the concrete proposal there
> > will need to
> > be some kind of procurement process here to ensure we don't drag Fedora and
> > Red Hat
> > into legal troubles.
>
> You might want to converse with FESCo as well. They are currently
> coming up with text to their third party repository page so that it
> doesn't conflict with the Council direction. At the moment, the draft
> text[1] requires repositories to be approved by Fedora Legal and
> FESCo.
>
> [1]
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1617#comment:8
>
> josh
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org