Re: First Atomic Workstation/WorkstationOstree update

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:23:20PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > A big picture question is how much we stay in sync with Workstation
> > as it exists today; for example I find
> > it confusing to have applications both via rpm and flatpak, and I think
> > it'd make sense to thin things down more.   At least drop gnome-boxes
> > by default, and potentially libvirt too.
>
> Will it be useful for labs variants like Design Suite which is based on
> Workstation?

I'd *really* like to see these be primarily add-ons available through
the Software center rather than completely different install media —
although we could also produce ISOs for use at events or whatever where
a particular live image makes sense.