Send Fedora-desktop-list mailing list submissions to
    fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    fedora-desktop-list-owner@redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Fedora-desktop-list digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd (Matthias Clasen)
   2. Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd (Matthias Clasen)
   3. Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd (Bill Nottingham)
   4. Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd (Matej Cepl)
   5. Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd (Nicu Buculei)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:46:16 -0400
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
    <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1249562776.1608.3.camel@planemask>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:26 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 14:51 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > The live cd has a very hard time shrinking below 700M, and it is not
> > going to get better when it switches to use a dracut initrd.
> >
> > One way to make sufficient room on the live cd would be to drop Gimp.
> >
> > This has been proposed independently, on the grounds that it is not a
> > very good fit for the live cd audience anyway (where we probably at most
> > need the occasional photo touch ups), and its UI is somewhat
> > unconventional.
> >
> > There is probably not going to be any alternative to this step, due to
> > the hard size limits, but I'd like to give people a chance to comment
> > first, anyway. So, comments ?
>
> Would dropping just the gimp user docs, or the extra data be enough?
>

Those were already gone. And it was not enough.

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:47:38 -0400
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
    <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1249562858.1608.5.camel@planemask>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:49 +0000, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi, Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:39:01 -0700:
> > I don't think Nicu and Gerd are talking so much about random features
> > that random users want to try... I think they're talking more about the
> > best of breed software and "killer apps" that allow people to see the
> > quality of programs written via a free software approach. In this vein,
> > GIMP and firefox are both projects that are showcase pieces. They show
> > people that free software can be quality software that is a valid
> > alternative to proprietary offerings from Adobe and Microsoft.
>
> Well, if we want to follow this logic, than we should throw a lot of
> stuff before removing OpenOffice.org from it, right?
>

Replacing abiword with the entire openoffice suite blows the iso size up
to 825M.

Replacing abiword with just oowriter still blows the iso size up to
820M.

This is without any openoffice lang packs.

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:54:51 -0400
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd
To: fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <20090806135451.GC8712@nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Paul W. Frields (stickster@gmail.com) said:
> > Some best-of-breed open source stuff like puppet, or apache,
> > or <insert other examples here> doesn't really lend itself to a
> > demo-ware spin. Which doesn't mean you shouldn't/couldn't have one,
> > but it's not going to be a full best-of-breed of what Fedora can do.
>
> Is there any appeal in doing something more useful with
> start.fedoraproject.org, the default browser home page? Such as
> putting a few best of breed apps on the page, with links to the latest
> builds that PK can install at a click?

See bug 315171; there's been ideas floated in this space for a while,
but there just haven't been people with time to take the ball and
run with it.

If there are people on this thread who want to tackle these sorts of
thing and have the time to do it (I think we've sort of conclusively
proven that the base development & packaging people don't, unfortunately),
I'm all for it.

Bill

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:54:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Matej Cepl <mcepl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd
To: fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <h5eqqi$igg$2@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Matthias Clasen, Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:47:38 -0400:
>> Well, if we want to follow this logic, than we should throw a lot of
>> stuff before removing OpenOffice.org from it, right?
>>
> Replacing abiword with the entire openoffice suite blows the iso size up
> to 825M.
>
> Replacing abiword with just oowriter still blows the iso size up to
> 820M.
>
> This is without any openoffice lang packs.

I know and I am not fighting for OOo inclusion, just showing that we
don't follow "make the most useful and shiny apps available" logic
already.

Matěj

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:26:17 +0300
From: Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora@nicubunu.ro>
Subject: Re: Dropping Gimp from the live cd
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
    <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4A7AF619.6020407@nicubunu.ro>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

On 08/06/2009 05:54 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> I know and I am not fighting for OOo inclusion, just showing that we
> don't follow "make the most useful and shiny apps available" logic
> already.

OOo is so big so it is an exception, is it or *several* other
applications, making the choice easier.

...and it can be argued OOo is not "cool", is "useful", you do with it
mostly boring stuff. It is also not integrated well in the desktop and
so on.

--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/

------------------------------

--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

End of Fedora-desktop-list Digest, Vol 66, Issue 9
**************************************************