On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:02 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> 1. Limit the frequency of non-critical updates to once per week in
> stable releases
This gets pretty difficult to manage if we want to insert any testing of
the proposed update set to be pushed out. It increases the number of
potential push sets, per release, which increases the complexity quite a
bit in the depchecking routines.
I'm not saying it's something we shouldn't do, I'm just saying that
going to make something significantly more complex to manage.
I don't understand this, tbh. If anything, doing more testing for each
set of updates would seem to benefit from pushing updates less
frequently, since it gives us more time to actually test them. Is that
not the case ?