On 8/26/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jon Nettleton</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jon.nettleton@gmail.com">jon.nettleton@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I am sorry but this is really the perfect example of Fedora&#39;s problem.<br>The community tries to better the project and is slapped down at the<br>last minute because in some hidden meeting the powers that be<br>have decided a different roadmap.&nbsp;
</blockquote><div><br>Have you posted your patches?&nbsp; Maybe they turn out to be simple enough?<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I guess when Fedora X is released we will get all the great functionality<br>mentioned above.&nbsp;&nbsp;I am greatly saddened and discouraged by this<br>sort of response to an exciting and interesting thread.&nbsp;&nbsp;Maybe the<br>future really is a CentOS like fork for the desktop, and not just a spin.
</blockquote><div><br>What the Desktop SIG/spin is about is to do the small tweaks to Fedora to make it a better desktop.&nbsp; If we get blocked on some larger changes to the underlying OS (like this bootup sequence), the answer isn&#39;t to fork.&nbsp; Let&#39;s be honest, there are a bazillion other Linux distributions out there, I think few people here have the desire to add to the pool.&nbsp; Keep in mind what makes Fedora Fedora (among other things, but in this context...) is that we try to get everything upstream and we try to have a unified code base.&nbsp; 
<br><br></div></div>