~/Desktop icon doesn't have Bluecurve style

[Leo]

Dear all,



A while back, I have raised the issue that the ~/Desktop icon should
not have a component from gnome default icon theme.

It is not isometric perspective[1] and it does *NOT* use the Bluecurve
palette[1].

Should we consider changing the Icon? Just my thought. I'm no
artist:-(

Footnotes: 
[1] 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/BluecurveIconGuidelines?action=show...

-- 
Leon

[Nicu Buculei]

Leon wrote:
>  A while back, I have raised the issue that the ~/Desktop icon should
>  not have a component from gnome default icon theme.
>  
>  It is not isometric perspective[1] and it does *NOT* use the Bluecurve
>  palette[1].
>  
>  Should we consider changing the Icon? Just my thought. I'm no
>  artist:-( 
I think it more than that: the Places menu contains a different icon 
(which *is* Bluecurve) for the same item (the Desktop directory).
Wold not be consistent to use just one of them in both cases?

-- 
nicu
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

[Ray Strode]

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:48 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>  Leon wrote:
>  > A while back, I have raised the issue that the ~/Desktop icon should
>  > not have a component from gnome default icon theme.
>  > 
>  > It is not isometric perspective[1] and it does *NOT* use the Bluecurve
>  > palette[1].
>  > 
>  > Should we consider changing the Icon? Just my thought. I'm no
>  > artist:-(
>  
>  I think it more than that: the Places menu contains a different icon 
>  (which *is* Bluecurve) for the same item (the Desktop directory).
>  Wold not be consistent to use just one of them in both cases?
>   
Seems reasonable to me.

Can one of you guys file a bug report?

--Ray

[Leo]

Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:

>  On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:48 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > Leon wrote:
> > > A while back, I have raised the issue that the ~/Desktop icon should
> > > not have a component from gnome default icon theme.
> > > 
> > > It is not isometric perspective[1] and it does *NOT* use the Bluecurve
> > > palette[1].
> > > 
> > > Should we consider changing the Icon? Just my thought. I'm no
> > > artist:-(
> > 
> > I think it more than that: the Places menu contains a different icon 
> > (which *is* Bluecurve) for the same item (the Desktop directory).
> > Wold not be consistent to use just one of them in both cases?
> > 
>  Seems reasonable to me.
>
>  Can one of you guys file a bug report?
>
>  --Ray 
I did file a bug but was closed the next day. They don't think that's
a bug.

-- 
Leon

[Leo]

Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:

>  On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:48 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > Leon wrote:
> > > A while back, I have raised the issue that the ~/Desktop icon should
> > > not have a component from gnome default icon theme.
> > > 
> > > It is not isometric perspective[1] and it does *NOT* use the Bluecurve
> > > palette[1].
> > > 
> > > Should we consider changing the Icon? Just my thought. I'm no
> > > artist:-(
> > 
> > I think it more than that: the Places menu contains a different icon 
> > (which *is* Bluecurve) for the same item (the Desktop directory).
> > Wold not be consistent to use just one of them in both cases?
> > 
>  Seems reasonable to me.
>
>  Can one of you guys file a bug report?
>
>  --Ray 
Done!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191009

-- 
Leon