Evolution-connector 2.2

[Anze Vidmar]

Hello!

FC4 came out with Evolution and evolution-connecotr version 2.2. In FC3, 
when I was using evolution-connector 2.0 (default for FC3) everything 
worked fine, but since version 2.2 I can't connect to Exchange OWA no 
more, getting "no mailbox for user anze" althought i can autenticate 
just fine.

Searched google and found nothing useful. Novell don't even have docs 
regarding version 2.2.

Any help would be appriciated.

Anze

[David Malcolm]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:56 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>  Hello!
>  
>  FC4 came out with Evolution and evolution-connecotr version 2.2. In FC3, 
>  when I was using evolution-connector 2.0 (default for FC3) everything 
>  worked fine, but since version 2.2 I can't connect to Exchange OWA no 
>  more, getting "no mailbox for user anze" althought i can autenticate 
>  just fine.
>  
>  Searched google and found nothing useful. Novell don't even have docs 
>  regarding version 2.2.
>  
>  Any help would be appriciated. 
Is your username different from your mailbox name?  This was supported
in 2.0 and I think it may have been broken in 2.2

[Anze Vidmar]

David Malcolm wrote:
>  On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:56 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>  Is your username different from your mailbox name?  This was supported
>  in 2.0 and I think it may have been broken in 2.2 
Yes. my username is anze and my
mailbox name is anze.vidmar. However, 
I've also created alias for my mailbox name that is anze, but no luck 
either. In OWA for example it works fine. I just wanted to make sure if 
this is "by design" error. And it looks like it really is.

[David Malcolm]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:16 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>  David Malcolm wrote:
>  > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:56 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>  > Is your username different from your mailbox name?  This was supported
>  > in 2.0 and I think it may have been broken in 2.2
>  Yes. my username is anze and my mailbox name is anze.vidmar. However, 
>  I've also created alias for my mailbox name that is anze, but no luck 
>  either. In OWA for example it works fine. I just wanted to make sure if 
>  this is "by design" error. And it looks like it really is. 
I think you may be right.  This is already in the upstream bugzilla
here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273627

Please can you file this in Red Hat's bugzilla as well, as this feels
like a major regression to me.

Thanks

Dave

[Nando]

Well, i was never able to put it to work on FC3.
I've even tried getting sources and recompiling, with patchs found on 
the web, and nothing. So i give up using that.
And by the quantity of info found, about other persons with problems 
too. I think this is, and will be a problematic thing.
So in my case is not a regression, is keeps the same. A good thing to 
do, is someone that had it working to do a good tutorial or step by step
about how to make it work. Because i've noticed that this component is 
very sensitive to small mistakes.


David Malcolm wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:16 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>   
>
> >David Malcolm wrote:
> >    
> >
> >>On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:56 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
> >>Is your username different from your mailbox name?  This was supported
> >>in 2.0 and I think it may have been broken in 2.2
> >>      
> >>
> >Yes. my username is anze and my mailbox name is anze.vidmar. However, 
> >I've also created alias for my mailbox name that is anze, but no luck 
> >either. In OWA for example it works fine. I just wanted to make sure if 
> >this is "by design" error. And it looks like it really is.
> >    
> >
>
> I think you may be right.  This is already in the upstream bugzilla
> here:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273627
>
> Please can you file this in Red Hat's bugzilla as well, as this feels
> like a major regression to me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
>
>   
>  

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.3/15 - Release Date: 14-06-2005

[Anze Vidmar]

Nando wrote:
>  Well, i was never able to put it to work on FC3.
>  I've even tried getting sources and recompiling, with patchs found on 
>  the web, and nothing. So i give up using that. 
  A good thing to
>  do, is someone that had it working to do a good tutorial or step by
> step
>  about how to make it work. Because i've noticed that this component is 
>  very sensitive to small mistakes. 
After reading this, I've decided that i will
write it myself, including 
screenshots. Becuase i spent a lot of time configure it myself to 
finnaly make it work on 2.0 version. Ans I know this IS a great peace of 
software that many ppl would like to use it. I will also include my 
exchange configuration and provide you with screenshots. I hope it will 
be usefull to someone. I'll post this on FedoraNEWS.org, where I'm 
registered as an contributor. I'll also post a link to this newsgroup 
when I'm done. Till than....

[David Malcolm]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 16:39 +0200, Anze Vidmar wrote:
>  Nando wrote:
>  > Well, i was never able to put it to work on FC3.
>  > I've even tried getting sources and recompiling, with patchs found on 
>  > the web, and nothing. So i give up using that.
>    A good thing to
>  > do, is someone that had it working to do a good tutorial or step by step
>  > about how to make it work. Because i've noticed that this component is 
>  > very sensitive to small mistakes.
>  After reading this, I've decided that i will write it myself, including 
>  screenshots. Becuase i spent a lot of time configure it myself to 
>  finnaly make it work on 2.0 version. Ans I know this IS a great peace of 
>  software that many ppl would like to use it. I will also include my 
>  exchange configuration and provide you with screenshots. I hope it will 
>  be usefull to someone. I'll post this on FedoraNEWS.org, where I'm 
>  registered as an contributor. I'll also post a link to this newsgroup 
>  when I'm done. Till than....
>   
That would be great!