Re: Karma threshold for kernel
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:29:23 -0600, Michael wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Nah. The same way you could consider all bodhi comments "spam". If you
> are the first commenter of a popular package, you receive lots of
> notifications for all subsequent comments (where sometimes people
> even use bodhi to argue about something).
Michael, how is posting:
user(a)radiopresenter.me.uk (unauthenticated) - 2010-03-08 13:36:44 (karma: 0)
Error Type: <class 'yum.Errors.RepoError'> Error Value: Error getting
repository data for installed, repository not found File :
/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 3125, in <module>
main() File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line
3122, in
main backend.dispatcher(sys.argv[1:]) File :
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 710, in dispatcher
self.dispatch_command(args[0], args[1:]) File : /usr/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 657, in dispatch_command
self.update_packages(only_trusted, package_ids) File :
/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 1948, in
update_packages
signed = self._is_package_repo_signed(pkg) File :
/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 1437, in
_is_package_repo_signed repo = self.yumbase.repos.getRepo(pkg.repoid)
File : /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/repos.py, line 121, in getRepo
'Error getting repository data for $s, repository not found' $ (repoid)
Multiple times a week not considered spam? Really? Posting this prior to
stable pushes is fine -- I never consider it spam.
It's a clueless user, who abuses bodhi's features to post anonymous
comments. Just turn off that feature, and let people register for either
a Fedora account or a Fedora Bodhi account. Then it would be possible
to take further action.
If I could CC you on
some of those updates maybe you would change your opinion.
Are you kidding? It would only influence my opinion about you.
I've been subscribed to enough bodhi tickets before.