On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:22:38PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
"sufficient developer resources" means, etc.
I think we'll want to discuss the documentation and website scenario
first - I have no idea how well PPC was documented when it was a primary
architecture, and we don't necessarily want to hold new ones to a higher
standard when it comes to that. But yes, I'll tidy up the rest before
the fesco meeting.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org