On 08/12/2010 02:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (limb(a)jcomserv.net) said:
> I disagree that a clockwork release schedule is required for quality, or
> even perceived quality. If that's the sort of metric being looked at,
> the user is probably best suited to RHEL, CentOS, etc.
It would be interesting to look at RHEL/CentOS to see how predictable
their release schedule actually is. I'd wager it's not that predictable
Good point, I seem to remember talk at one point about RHEL6 being Q2
2010. Not sure where I heard that, though, so someone with better
information should weigh in.
- in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love