Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:53 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> We should change or refine the Freeze Policy page then. Having different
> definitions of what is required for alpha to go out and what can go in
> after alpha leads to incorrect expectations on the part of developers.
I agree. I think probably all we need to do is remove the weasel-word
'testable' and give a more solid definition there.
Well, the Freeze Policy page is about targets feature owners should meet,
not about Alpha blockers.