Rawhide build failure (Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig)

[Roland Grunberg]

I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig in
/usr/sbin/ as per : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.

It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting the following
when attempting a scratch build in rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3740496&name=root.log

Cheers,
-- 
Roland Grunberg

[Rex Dieter]

Roland Grunberg wrote:

>  I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig in
>  /usr/sbin/ as per : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.
>  
>  It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting the following
>  when attempting a scratch build in rawhide. 
Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to f17-usrmove tag 
instead.

-- rex

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  Roland Grunberg wrote:
>  
> > I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig in 
> > /usr/sbin/ as per :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.
> > 
> > It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting the
> > following when attempting a scratch build in rawhide.
>  
>  Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to
>  f17-usrmove tag instead.
>  
>  -- rex
>  
>   
Oops, I thought we could build packages now.  I also built an updated
policycoreutils...

When are we throwing the big switch in Rawhide?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk8jGOIACgkQrlYvE4MpobNrqACg0w00KmRLqKGaVAAkYa3lQMlx
> 1+IAoJwXalYWkkRby6X4NAVS0WrSzpMG
> =pKBf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  > Roland Grunberg wrote:
>  > 
>  >> I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig in 
>  >> /usr/sbin/ as per :
>  >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.
>  >> 
>  >> It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting the
>  >> following when attempting a scratch build in rawhide.
>  > 
>  > Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to
>  > f17-usrmove tag instead.
>  > 
>  > -- rex
>  > 
>  > 
>  Oops, I thought we could build packages now.  I also built an updated
>  policycoreutils...
>  
>  When are we throwing the big switch in Rawhide? 
Well, if I were the Big Kahuna, I'd like at least a few successful tests
of the migration, a test of a fresh install of F17 with the changed
packages (we can build images to do this), and possibly a definite
resolution to the reservations some still seem to have about the
requirements for patched rpm and stuff. Dennis....?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/27/2012 09:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>  On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Roland Grunberg wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig
> >>> in /usr/sbin/ as per : 
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.
> >>> 
> >>> It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting
> >>> the following when attempting a scratch build in rawhide.
> >> 
> >> Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to 
> >> f17-usrmove tag instead.
> >> 
> >> -- rex
> >> 
> >> 
> > Oops, I thought we could build packages now.  I also built an
> > updated policycoreutils...
> > 
> > When are we throwing the big switch in Rawhide?
>  
>  Well, if I were the Big Kahuna, I'd like at least a few successful
>  tests of the migration, a test of a fresh install of F17 with the
>  changed packages (we can build images to do this), and possibly a
>  definite resolution to the reservations some still seem to have
>  about the requirements for patched rpm and stuff. Dennis....? 

Ok the problem with that is people like me run in rawhide all the time
to try to prevent other people seeing SELinux Hickups.  So the sooner
I see major changes the better.  Do we have a yum repository I could
point at to switch my machine to the new usrmove environment.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk8j6n0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNA+QCeOkRZ7XSSV4n6Zr9ljbBLpe7+
> skgAoOQBMze6Vc7X8L3lsGqFkJ4azZMf
> =VlBr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Frank Murphy]

On 28/01/12 12:30, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  Ok the problem with that is people like me run in rawhide all the time
>  to try to prevent other people seeing SELinux Hickups.  So the sooner
>  I see major changes the better.  Do we have a yum repository I could
>  point at to switch my machine to the new usrmove environment. 
Full instructions:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161761.html#

Add f17-usrmove in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/f17-usrmove.repo
  [f17-usrmove]
  name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
  failovermethod=priority
  baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f17-usrmove/latest/$basearch
  enabled=1
  metadata_expire=1d
  gpgcheck=0

# yum clean all
# yum upgrade


-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 07:30 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  On 01/27/2012 09:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>  > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  >> On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  >>> Roland Grunberg wrote:
>  >>> 
>  >>>> I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig
>  >>>> in /usr/sbin/ as per : 
>  >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove.
>  >>>> 
>  >>>> It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting
>  >>>> the following when attempting a scratch build in rawhide.
>  >>> 
>  >>> Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to 
>  >>> f17-usrmove tag instead.
>  >>> 
>  >>> -- rex
>  >>> 
>  >>> 
>  >> Oops, I thought we could build packages now.  I also built an
>  >> updated policycoreutils...
>  >> 
>  >> When are we throwing the big switch in Rawhide?
>  > 
>  > Well, if I were the Big Kahuna, I'd like at least a few successful
>  > tests of the migration, a test of a fresh install of F17 with the
>  > changed packages (we can build images to do this), and possibly a
>  > definite resolution to the reservations some still seem to have
>  > about the requirements for patched rpm and stuff. Dennis....?
>  
>  
>  Ok the problem with that is people like me run in rawhide all the time
>  to try to prevent other people seeing SELinux Hickups.  So the sooner
>  I see major changes the better.  Do we have a yum repository I could
>  point at to switch my machine to the new usrmove environment. 
There were instructions in the announcement thread on exactly how you
can test the changes right now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

[Kevin Kofler]

Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  Oops, I thought we could build packages now.  I also built an
> updated
>  policycoreutils... 
And why didn't you untag the darn package? All our daily live image builds 
failed today because of this!

I moved your build to the f17-usrmove tag where it belongs. (Any packager 
can do this because neither f17 nor f17-usrmove are locked tags.)

        Kevin Kofler