9:43 a.m.
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
are moved to native systemd services.
Bill
10:03 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:43:33AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
I'll try it this afternoon.
--
Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
11:05 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
Didn't automount anything from fstab other than /, not even /home. Even
when I logged in on the console with a user that has a home directory
there. Manually starting the corresponding *.mount units worked.
9:48 p.m.
Yanko Kaneti (yaneti(a)declera.com) said:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
Didn't automount anything from fstab other than /, not even /home. Even
when I logged in on the console with a user that has a home directory
there. Manually starting the corresponding *.mount units worked.
It's not supposed to do that through systemd mount units... yet. There's a
separate service for that.
Bill
9:50 p.m.
Bill Nottingham (notting(a)redhat.com) said:
Yanko Kaneti (yaneti(a)declera.com) said:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
>
> Didn't automount anything from fstab other than /, not even /home. Even
> when I logged in on the console with a user that has a home directory
> there. Manually starting the corresponding *.mount units worked.
It's not supposed to do that through systemd mount units... yet. There's a
separate service for that.
To elaborate more... what does 'systemctl status fedora-mountall.service'
say?
Bill
1:03 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 22:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bill Nottingham (notting(a)redhat.com) said:
> Yanko Kaneti (yaneti(a)declera.com) said:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
> >
> > Didn't automount anything from fstab other than /, not even /home. Even
> > when I logged in on the console with a user that has a home directory
> > there. Manually starting the corresponding *.mount units worked.
>
> It's not supposed to do that through systemd mount units... yet. There's a
> separate service for that.
To elaborate more... what does 'systemctl status fedora-mountall.service'
say?
fedora-mountall.service - Check, mount, and relabel all filesystems
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/fedora-mountall.service)
Active: inactive (dead)
CGroup: name=systemd:/systemd-1/fedora-mountall.service
which seems to be caused by
fedora-init-crypto-1.service - Initialize encrypted storage
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/fedora-init-crypto-1.service)
Active: failed since [Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:57:39 +0300; 1min 24s ago]
Process: 1021 (/lib/systemd/fedora-init-crypto 0, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
CGroup: name=systemd:/systemd-1/fedora-init-crypto-1.service
# systemctl restart fedora-init-crypto-1.service
on the console just seems to hang
Yanko
1:40 a.m.
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 09:03 +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
..
which seems to be caused by
fedora-init-crypto-1.service - Initialize encrypted storage
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/fedora-init-crypto-1.service)
Active: failed since [Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:57:39 +0300; 1min 24s ago]
Process: 1021 (/lib/systemd/fedora-init-crypto 0, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
CGroup: name=systemd:/systemd-1/fedora-init-crypto-1.service
Which seems to be caused by a "missing" /etc/crypttab
I've never had this file apparently.
# touch /etc/crypttab
and the systems seem to boot as exected
Cheers
Yanko
9:24 p.m.
On Fri, 22.10.10 13:21, Bill Nottingham (notting(a)redhat.com) wrote:
Yanko Kaneti (yaneti(a)declera.com) said:
> Which seems to be caused by a "missing" /etc/crypttab
> I've never had this file apparently.
> # touch /etc/crypttab
> and the systems seem to boot as exected
Fixed in git, thanks for the report.
BTW: A nice way to make activation of services conditional based on
existance of a file is the relatively new ConditionPathExists= setting
in [Unit]. If the file listed there doesn't exist, then the unit will
not actualy be started, however, it is still useful for all
synchronization purposes, and hence not disrupt startup in any way.
You can even specify more than one file in which case the unit will be
run when at least one of those files exists.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
10:27 a.m.
Lennart Poettering (mzerqung(a)0pointer.de) said:
> Fixed in git, thanks for the report.
BTW: A nice way to make activation of services conditional based on
existance of a file is the relatively new ConditionPathExists= setting
in [Unit]. If the file listed there doesn't exist, then the unit will
not actualy be started, however, it is still useful for all
synchronization purposes, and hence not disrupt startup in any way.
You can even specify more than one file in which case the unit will be
run when at least one of those files exists.
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=12cabd75191...
Bill
11:47 a.m.
Hi,
2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
are moved to native systemd services.
I would like to test this, but before testing this packages I updated
system to latest rawhide and now I don't have network :(
dhclient eth0 shows me this:
system library: fopen: Permission denied: bss_file.c:165
fopen('/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf', 'rb')
BIO routines:BIO_new_file:system lib:bss_file.c:168
configuration file routines:DEF_LOAD:system lib:conf_def.c:199
Any ideas what could go wrong?
/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf perm is 644
Which package I should downgrade?
Bill
Regards,
Michal
12:01 p.m.
2010/10/21 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com>:
Hi,
2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
> I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
>
> This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
> that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
> services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
> in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
>
> Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
> There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
> are moved to native systemd services.
I would like to test this, but before testing this packages I updated
system to latest rawhide and now I don't have network :(
dhclient eth0 shows me this:
system library: fopen: Permission denied: bss_file.c:165
fopen('/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf', 'rb')
BIO routines:BIO_new_file:system lib:bss_file.c:168
configuration file routines:DEF_LOAD:system lib:conf_def.c:199
Any ideas what could go wrong?
/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf perm is 644
Which package I should downgrade?
Any SELINUX avcs?
1:01 p.m.
2010/10/21 drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com>:
Any SELINUX avcs?
indeed there is an AVC (I forgot about SELinux :) - I do not use it
and I forgot to turn it off after installation)
type=AVC msg=audit(1287683664.377:70): avc: denied { getattr } for
pid=1679 comm="dhclient" path="/etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf" dev=sda2
ino=283618 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:cert_t:s0 tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1287683664.377:70): arch=c000003e syscall=5
success=yes exit=0 a0=4 a1=7fff7b86f210 a2=7fff7b86f210
a3=7fff7b86f0f0 items=0 ppid=1678 pid=1679 auid=500 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0
suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts0 ses=1 comm="dhclient"
exe="/sbin/dhclient" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
key=(null)
I'll solve this problem using big hammer and I'll test systemd changes.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Michal
7:41 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/2010 12:47 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
> I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
>
> This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
> that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
> services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
> in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
>
> Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
> There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
> are moved to native systemd services.
I would like to test this, but before testing this packages I updated
system to latest rawhide and now I don't have network :(
dhclient eth0 shows me this:
system library: fopen: Permission denied: bss_file.c:165
fopen('/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf', 'rb')
BIO routines:BIO_new_file:system lib:bss_file.c:168
configuration file routines:DEF_LOAD:system lib:conf_def.c:199
Any ideas what could go wrong?
/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf perm is 644
Which package I should downgrade?
>
> Bill
Regards,
Michal
This is an SELinux issue. dhclient has been changed to read
/etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf
And SELinux is not allowing it.
selinux-policy-3.9.7-5.fc15
in koji should fix the problem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzBhl0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMqQCeKBAzBp9D6MtT+WDIY/R9BkDh
0DYAoMnlm1Z3JXVqo+4RqPb60yoO/FBz
=zgeY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8 a.m.
W dniu 22 października 2010 14:41 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh
<dwalsh(a)redhat.com> napisał:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/2010 12:47 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
>> I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
>>
>> This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
>> that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
>> services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
>> in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
>>
>> Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
>> There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
>> are moved to native systemd services.
>
> I would like to test this, but before testing this packages I updated
> system to latest rawhide and now I don't have network :(
>
> dhclient eth0 shows me this:
> system library: fopen: Permission denied: bss_file.c:165
> fopen('/etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf', 'rb')
> BIO routines:BIO_new_file:system lib:bss_file.c:168
> configuration file routines:DEF_LOAD:system lib:conf_def.c:199
>
> Any ideas what could go wrong?
>
> /etc/pki/tls/open_ssl.cnf perm is 644
>
> Which package I should downgrade?
>
>>
>> Bill
>
> Regards,
> Michal
This is an SELinux issue. dhclient has been changed to read
/etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf
And SELinux is not allowing it.
Thanks for the information. I already solved this problem on my machine.
Thanks,
Michal
selinux-policy-3.9.7-5.fc15
in koji should fix the problem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzBhl0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMqQCeKBAzBp9D6MtT+WDIY/R9BkDh
0DYAoMnlm1Z3JXVqo+4RqPb60yoO/FBz
=zgeY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1:14 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
Works for me on my rawhide box. It's a pretty simple setup so I doubt
I'm hitting any interesting edge cases.
--
Jeff Ollie
1:50 p.m.
2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
are moved to native systemd services.
28 seconds - not optiomised system
http://i52.tinypic.com/fe28vs.png
It's a really good start point - very promising :)
Let's see what can be achieved
Regards,
M
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2:10 p.m.
W dniu 21 października 2010 20:50 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
<mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com> napisał:
2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>:
> I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
>
> This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
> that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
> services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
> in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
>
> Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
> There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
> are moved to native systemd services.
28 seconds - not optiomised system
http://i52.tinypic.com/fe28vs.png
It's a really good start point - very promising :)
Let's see what can be achieved
24 seconds (23 in previous test)
http://i53.tinypic.com/30kvpxg.png
IMO pretty good as for the system with enabled debuging :)
Well done! Thanks!
Regards,
Michal
7:58 a.m.
On 10/21/2010 04:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/
This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages
that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd
services. (Essentially, rc.sysinit is dead.) Before putting this
in rawhide, we want to make sure it's not too horribly broken.
Feedback welcome in bugzilla (against initscripts) or on the list.
There may be additional changes pushed to the repo as more things
are moved to native systemd services.
Bill
Since initscripts-legacy is complement to initscripts
initscripts-legacy should have
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Petr
--
Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.
4927
days inactive
4934
days old
19 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Bill Nottingham -
Daniel J Walsh -
drago01 -
Jeffrey Ollie -
Lennart Poettering -
Matthew Miller -
Michał Piotrowski -
Petr Lautrbach -
Yanko Kaneti