Re: rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log,1.1,1.2 sylpheed.spec,1.100,1.101

[Michael Schwendt]

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:53:29 +0000 (UTC), Itamar wrote:

>  Author: itamarjp
>  
>  Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sylpheed/devel 
>  +%post   -p /sbin/ldconfig
>  +%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
>   
>  -%post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
>   
>  +%post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
>   %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig 
You don't want to add ldconfig calls to the -devel package.

Also, before shipping the API for this libsylph, keep an eye
on the current discussion of it.

rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101

[Josephine Tannhäuser]

2009/7/28 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt;

>  You don't want to add ldconfig calls to the -devel package.
>
>  Also, before shipping the API for this libsylph, keep an eye
>  on the current discussion of it.
>  
means 2.7.0 comes to rawhide?

-- 
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586

rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101

[itamar]

yes, any reson to not do this /

I am reading messages about libsylphed

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Josephine
Tannhäuser<josephine.tannhauser(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>  2009/7/28 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt;
> >
> > You don't want to add ldconfig calls to the -devel package.
> >
> > Also, before shipping the API for this libsylph, keep an eye
> > on the current discussion of it.
>
>  means 2.7.0 comes to rawhide?
>
>  --
>  Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
>  2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
>
>  --
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>  


-- 
------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
sip: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
[phone]
[phone]

rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:10:46 -0300, Itamar wrote:

>  yes, any reson to not do this / 
Is that a question?

And please don't top-post.

rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101

[Josephine Tannhäuser]

from dif cvs
-%define tarversion 2.6.0
+%global tarversion 2.7.0

you don't need to switch from define to global (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_ov...)
if 2 macros, %{tarversion} and %{version}, are using the same content
"2.7.0"

please remove tarversion to keep that clean!
-- 
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586

rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:48:42 +0200, Josephine wrote:

>  from dif cvs
>  -%define tarversion 2.6.0
>  +%global tarversion 2.7.0
>  
>  you don't need to switch from define to global (
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_ov...)
>  if 2 macros, %{tarversion} and %{version}, are using the same content
>  "2.7.0"
>  
>  please remove tarversion to keep that clean! 
No, don't.  %tarversion is in there on purpose. For beta/rc releases,
%version and %tarversion differ. It doesn't make much sense to remove such
a variable and its usage in several places only to put it back when
necessary.