devel November 2007

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

350 participants
427 discussions

Rawhide uninstallable
by Orion Poplawski 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Seems like rawhide has been uninstallable for the last few days. This seems to be a bad sign to me. Is it? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

4 3

EPEL report week 44 2007
by Thorsten Leemhuis 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week44 Heads up: we didn't meet in recent weeks; we really should try to get a proper meeting this Wednesday (e.g two days from now). If you are interested in EPEL: come, join us! ---- = Weekly EPEL Summary = Week 44/2007 == Most important happenings == * Seems testing stable move went well; at least we only got one complaint of a broken dep, which was fixed ;-) * Some discussions about redistributing EPEL binaries; see this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-November/msg00005.html * EPEL will now only keep only one version of a packages in testing (e.g. only the latest one and not one older one in addition, as done in the proper repos); see https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-November/msg00000.html == Meeting == No meeting past week. Next meeting 20071107 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting == Stats == === General === Number of EPEL Contributors: 137 === EPEL 5 === Number of source packages: 716 Number of binary packages: 1376 There are 10 new Packages: * cdpr | Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer * func | Remote config, monitoring, and management api * perl-LockFile-Simple | Simple file locking scheme * perl-Tk | Perl Graphical User Interface ToolKit * postgis | Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL * ruby-ldap | Ruby LDAP libraries * tre | POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching * unshield | Install InstallShield applications on a Pocket PC * wordpress | WordPress blogging software * wv2 | A library which allows access to Microsoft® Word files === EPEL 4 === Number of source packages: 440 Number of binary packages: 888 There are 6 new Packages: * func | Remote config, monitoring, and management api * perl-LockFile-Simple | Simple file locking scheme * perl-Tk | Perl Graphical User Interface ToolKit * ruby-ldap | Ruby LDAP libraries * unshield | Install InstallShield applications on a Pocket PC * wv2 | A library which allows access to Microsoft® Word files ---- ["CategoryEPELReports"]

1 0

How to generate videoaliases/foo.xinf for hwdata?
by Hans Ulrich Niedermann 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Hi, I guess that for proper integration of xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd into Fedora the package should ship a /usr/share/hwdata/videoaliases/radeonhd.xinf file. Is the xinf file format documented somewhere? Are there tools to create it? -- Hans Ulrich Niedermann

6 8

Repo Suggestion
by Mark Bidewell 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Last week I tried moving to updates-testing in order to test latest KDE on F7. The resulting kernel update was mismatched with kernel-devel so I could not install the nvidia drivers. My suggestion is this. Would it be possible to segregate updates according to package type (similiar to the SUSE buildservice) or even just along the lines of Desktop (KDE/GNOME/etc and deps) and System( kernel etc.) so testing bleeding edge packages from one package group won't break other system packages? Mark Bidewell

4 4

Package XYZ is not signed
by Yonas Abraham 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

yum update fedora-release-notes produce Package fedora-release-notes-8.0.0-2.noarch.rpm is not signed this is true for about 16 pakages on my Rahwid system today /Yonas

11 18

The KDE-SIG needs (your) help
by Sebastian Vahl 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

This is a request for participation: The KDE-SIG [1] is atm lacking active contributors. And we really need some help in doing our job to provide a good KDE version in Fedora - especially with the upcoming KDE 4.0 and the inclusion in Fedora 9. If you don't know how you could help us here is a list (which is also in the wiki): * Packagers: There are so many interesting packages that are not yet packaged for Fedora. Package it to improve the user experience. * Reviewers: Only a few persons are doing the kde-related reviews. Help us reviewing so that more packages could be included. * Testers: If you love KDE use the development version or the updates-testing repository and report bugs, bugs, bugs, request enhancements or features. We need your feedback to improve KDE. * Bugs: Become a BugZapper and help us with kde-related bugs. * Documentation writers: The documentation (esp. the DesktopUserGuide) is GNOME-centered. Help us to provide an equivalent for KDE. * Release Notes: The few people that are working on the new KDE-Spin are quite busy with development issues. If you want to help us in writing the release notes for the next version of Fedora we would give you all the info you need. * Wiki: Maintain http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE and keep it updated with end user information. * Artists: To provide a matching theme for nodoka-metacity-theme and provide an unified desktop experience. But this is not a complete list. If you're interested in making KDE in Fedora better, you're more than welcome. The list of participants in the wiki is atm not a list of active contributors. When setting up the wiki the only demand was an interest in KDE to be listed on this page. This list would be changed in the future to be culled down to the list of active (or reactivated) participants. This has become necessarely because there are only (less or more) 3 active contributors atm (plus Than Ngo). But the list indicates that there are enough people helping with KDE. If you are interested in joining the KDE-SIG please add your name to this list, answer to this mail, join us in #fedora-kde at freenode or attend the weekly KDE-SIG-Meetings (every tuesday 17:00 UTC). I will also add a topic to the agenda of the meeting next week to introduce new contributors. [2] The attendance at the SIG-Meetings is of course not required. But this way we would know of each other. And they are also the main place of discussing the next steps in the development (besides fedora-devel-list). If you have any further questions please answer to this mail or write me directly. And be sure: If your are willing to help you're welcome (regardless of your skills). :) Sebastian [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2007-11-06

2 1

rawhide report: 20071105 changes
by Build System 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Updated Packages: (none) Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.23_0.142.rc3.git10.fc8.i686 requires kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.23-0.142.rc3.git10.fc8 kmod-sysprof-PAE - 1.0.8-1.2.6.23_0.142.rc3.git10.fc8.i686 requires kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.23-0.142.rc3.git10.fc8PAE Broken deps for x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------- kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.23_0.142.rc3.git10.fc8.x86_64 requires kernel-x86_64 = 0:2.6.23-0.142.rc3.git10.fc8

1 0

Re: rpms/blt/devel blt.spec,1.14,1.15
by Mamoru Tasaka 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Sergio Pascual (sergiopr) wrote, at 11/05/2007 06:16 PM +9:00: > Author: sergiopr > > Modified Files: > blt.spec > Log Message: > * Mon Nov 05 2007 Sergio Pascual <sergiopr at fedoraproject.org> 2.4-18 > - Providing file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d (bug #333081) > > > > Index: blt.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/blt/devel/blt.spec,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > retrieving revision 1.15 > diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 > --- blt.spec 23 Oct 2007 09:42:53 -0000 1.14 > +++ blt.spec 5 Nov 2007 09:16:10 -0000 1.15 > @@ -58,13 +58,21 @@ > echo 'package ifneeded BLT 2.4 "if {[llength [info commands tk]] > 0} {load [file join $dir libBLT24.so]} else {load [file join $dir libBLTlite24.so] BLT}"' > $DIRECTORY/pkgIndex.tcl > cp -p -r library/dd_protocols $DIRECTORY > rm -f html/Makefile.vc > +# File in /etc/ld.so.conf.d > +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d > +echo "%{_libdir}/blt2.4" >> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/ds9-%{_arch}.conf > Why is this ld.so.conf.d file named as ds9-%_arch.conf? Regards, Mamoru

1 0

virt-manager
by Mark Bidewell 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

I was looking at virt-manager in F8 and I notoced that it no longer seems to have gui install capability. has this been removed intentionally or is this a bug? Mark Bidewell

4 6

Re: F8 Nvidia Ethernet Ip Problem
by Otto Rey 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

File a bug ----- Mensaje original ---- De: Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin(a)ncsu.edu> Para: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com> Enviado: sábado 3 de noviembre de 2007, 21:45:28 Asunto: Re: F8 Nvidia Ethernet Ip Problem masch wrote: > I'm trying to set up Fedora 8 RC3 and i can't set up my network > device. I have nVidia MP55 ethernet and i'm can't get my ip from DHCP, > i have dual boot with WinXp, Sorry :D , and it work well. I was using > Fedora 7 and it's work too.... > > Can anybody know what it's the probem?? > > Salu2.. > > I've had this issue too. MCP55 on an Asus Striker Extreme mobo. For me it only worked with the stock F7 kernel. Even yum updating to a more recent F7 broke it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Noticias Todo lo que tenés que saber sobre Elecciones Presidenciales 2007 encontralo en Yahoo! Noticias. http://ar.news.yahoo.com/elecciones2007/

2 1

← Newer
1
...
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel November 2007