devel June 2007

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

327 participants
364 discussions

upgrading RH 9 system->Fedora with iso files and apt only
by Didier Casse 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

I have the yarrow's iso files on my HD in a RH9 system. Let's say I want to upgrade selected packages using an "apt-get install" pointing to my iso-mounted files, how do I do it? i.e I mount the iso into some /mnt/yarrow1, /mnt/yarrow 2 etc.. Then what is the complete procedure to make my apt look into my own HD to upgrade packages. Can anybody redirect me to the correct resource or some literature hanging on the web? Thanks. Assume also that I do not wish to burn CDs! I do not want to use apt-cdrom. Thanks. With kind regards, Didier. --- PhD student Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: slsbdfc at nus dot edu dot sg \or\ didierbe at sps dot nus dot edu dot sg Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg

6 9

kernel/accounting question ...
by William W. Austin 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

(I know that this question might be more reasonable on a kernel list, but a while back I posted the question twice and got no answers.) The acct struct is defined in /usr/include/sys/acct.h includes both ac_io and ac_rw for bytes transferred and blocks read or written, respectively. Fair and good - works (on paper) similarly to unix, solaris, hp-ux, etc. However, in the kernel code [kernel/acct.c], ac_io (char) and ac_rw (blocks) are always set to 0 by these two lines: ac.ac_io = encode_comp_t(0 /* current->io_usage */); ac.ac_rw = encode_comp_t(ac.ac_io / 1024); For most purposes, this probably wouldn't be an issue, but I also do extensive performance analysis on several platforms and have written a fairly compresive accounting package (as a wraparound for psacct or as a standalone) including both an improved acctcom and a built-in reporter for it. Does anyone know wby the kernel zero's out the bytes transferred data? (Overhead comes to mind.) Not that it makes a huge differnce for my purposes (I had to write some wraparound code to make a "best-guestimate" about the data I'm missing), but curiosity is bugging me now. When I compile my program on other OS's I get useful data for char and block i/o and I'd like to find out whether there is something obvious that I'm just totally missing here...). Thanks -- william w. austin waustin(a)speakeasy.net "life is just another phase i'm going through. this time, anyway ..."

4 3

acctcom for linux
by William W. Austin 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

I recently made several updates to a Linux version of of acctcom (actually another accounting add-on package) which I've been using for several years, and one of the people testing it asked a question which I cannot answer. I'm hoping that someone on this list can give me some info. I have previously (over a year ago) asked on both this and a couple of kernel lists (several times there) about this issue, but nobody has ever answered. So if you have any info about this, I'd really appreciate it. As in many (all?) previous Linux kernels, the struct acct (defined in /usr/include/sys/acct.h) has members ac_io and ac_rw which are presumably counts of characters transferred and blocks read/written respectively. However, in the kernel code, the ac_io is set to 0 and the ac_rw gets set to (ac_io/512) or some such - it is set to 0 as well (and thus these are always reported as 0 in process accounting records. not good if you're trying to measure them...). Does anybody know why this is done that way? A long time ago (IIRC late 2.2 and an early 2.4 kernel) I looked into "fixing" this in the kernel code but was not successful (I finally produced a bootable kernel, but it was unstable. Then I changed jobs, got swamped at work, and eventually gave up). As I said above, I have previously asked about this issue without success, and I have essentially given up changing or "fixing" it. But if anyone knows __WHY__ it is this way (I'm hypothesizing that it's just too much work for too little added value), I'd really appreciate knowing the reason. Curiosity and the cat and all that ... Thanks - Bill -- william w. austin waustin(a)speakeasy.net "life is just another phase i'm going through. this time, anyway ..."

3 2

Any way to search all .spec files?
by Orion Poplawski 25 Mar '08

25 Mar '08

Is there any was to do a grep/search on all of the Fedora .spec files for a specific release (or devel)? I'd be fine with checking them all out if there was a way to just the the spec files for a specific release. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

4 5

Re: Firefox 3
by Takanori MATSUURA 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

Hi all, I put firefox-trunk SRPM based on current fedora rawhide one at http://homepage2.nifty.com/t-matsuu/install-memo/fc/ Notice: this package breaks the dependency against devhelp and yelp. Janina Sajka <janina(a)rednote.net> wrote: > Does anyone know of any rpm builds of Firefox 3? I'm aware it's nowhere > near ready for prime time, but I have a compelling reason to start using > ff3 fairly soon and would rather install from rpm, of course. > > BTW: My compelling reason is that FF3 will contain a11y support that > should prove superior to any yet seen on any platform. Fingers crossed, > etc ... MATSUURA Takanori

8 13

glade3 in fedora7
by Deependra Singh Shekhawat 07 Nov '07

07 Nov '07

Hi, Is Glade3 available on Fedora7. I saw it has been stable for long time now and I found no package with name Glade3. Is there no Glade3 in Fedora7 and if it isn't why is it so ? Thanks

13 27

Self-Introduction: Denis Ovsienko and /etc/net project
by Denis Ovsienko 24 Oct '07

24 Oct '07

Denis Ovsienko Russia, Moscow Linux system administrator and developer ValueCommerce/Russia I develop /etc/net project (http://etcnet.org) and my goal is to integrate it into Fedora Core. I am a member of ALTLinux Team. /etc/net is already integrated into ALTLinux development tree and should soon be seen in 3.0 version. I know that ArchLinux has /etc/net in its repository. IDMS Linux did so too, but i haven't heard from them for last months. My skills include 6 years Linux experience, several programming languages, 5 years of mixed software development and system/network administration and so on, but I guess it's not related much to my goal now. I have reviewed current initscripts buglist. Some bugs are not bugs in /etc/net: #65114 RFE: ifup-aliases iproute support, ifup/ifup-aliases scop... #75390 it would be nice to tie bandwidth shaping into the networ... #129820 initscripts maclist patch #132252 Request for addition of routing rule config file #132912 No additional IP addresses at ethX without aliased devices #132925 initscripts use old ifconfig instead of iproute2 #154348 Adds support for WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access) to the ifup... #168990 No ifup-gre/ifdown-gre scripts. #170884 MTU of ethernet card can't be set before interface is up #171763 Enhancement to initscripts Some bugs gave me ideas how to improve /etc/net: #59114 .d-style scripts for ifup/ifdown #119952 RFE: Add hook for "local" network initialization #124045 Support setting a metric on interface routes The whole process, if we don't face some unexpected problems, should take 3 to 6 months. What I need: 1. Ability to advocate patches (sometimes heavy) to about 10-20 FC packages. 2. Probably some help with documentation. How can we start? pub 1024D/6D1844F2 2002-11-11 Key fingerprint = AF2F DDAE 7EB3 4699 09FF F0FC 00B1 6D41 6D18 44F2 uid Denis Ovsienko <linux(a)pilot.org.ua> uid Denis Ovsienko (http://pilot.org.ua) <pilot(a)altlinux.ru> sub 2048g/57B7ACBE 2002-11-11 -- DO4-UANIC

10 17

kqemu inclusion in kernel
by Christopher Brown 29 Aug '07

29 Aug '07

Hi folks, I've started playing around with virtualization at work and the first thing I'd like to query is kqemu's lack of inclusion in the Fedora kernel. It was GPL'd in February and although I realise Axel is packaging kmdl/kmods it would be good to know if this is being queued up for mainline. If not then can it be backported for Fedora kernels. If that is not possible then can it be moved into the default repos to save users (me) bolting on another repo (no offence Axel). Please forgive dual list posting but I know DJ reads the kernel list and might want to comment whereas I'm not sure AT does. And vice versa. Regards Chris

26 121

Anaconda crash for Turkish installation
by Baris Cicek 07 Aug '07

07 Aug '07

Hi all; I'm not quite sure if this bug mentioned before in the list, but since I could not find bug filed about it in anaconda bugs, I wanted to increase awareness. Turkish installation (probably some other languages also affected) has a problem with Fedora 7. Anaconda crashes with some unicode problem. Since I'm python ignorant I did not dare to dig into problem, but I'm affraid this important problem is due to minor translation issue. It's not possible to install fedora 7 unless you choose other language, and if you prefer to use Turkish, change the language post-install. That's not acceptable for regular user. I'm affraid most Turkish users think that Fedora has a problem and they choose other distributions. That problem existed in Fedora Core 6 as well. I should have tested the images for Fedora 7 but I thought that was fixed already. I hope there's a chance to fix this bug, and roll new ISOs as Fedora 7 is eary in its release time. Here's the bug report about the problem, anaconda traceback is also included. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244016 Regards, Baris.

4 3

Automating pam_keyring...
by Denis Leroy 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

Good news here, Jon released pam_keyring 0.0.9. It fixed the F-7 problem for me: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238741 I'll push an update shortly. Installing pam_keyring isn't enough though, it still requires manual edition of /etc/pam.d/gdm to make it work. I was hoping to start some discussions on what needs to happen to make its behavior enabled automatically upon installation, especially since this is on the F-8 wish list. Should it use a scriptlet that modifies /etc/pam.d/gdm in %post (see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232857 ). Or add a patch to the gdm package and make it require pam_keyring ? Or do we want to make this feature optional from authconfig ? Another issue is how do we update the keyring password when the user changes his/her password ? denis

15 31

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel June 2007