ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve
by Andy Lawrence
Couldn't find it on Bugzilla, do I need to report this? 10/27/08 Rawhide.
Thanks
Andy
Transaction Summary
=======================================================================================================================
Install 7 Package(s)
Update 117 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total size: 272 M
Downloading Packages:
Downloading DeltaRPMs:
Rebuilding rpms from deltarpms
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
libdb-4.3.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-18.fc10.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-libs-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-devel-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-build-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.3.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-18.fc10.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-libs-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-devel-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
libdb-4.5.so is needed by (installed) rpm-build-4.6.0-0.rc1.3.i386
Complete!
(1, [u'Please report this error in bugzilla'])
[root@localhost ~]#
--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org
15 years, 6 months
odf-converter for fedora
by Orion Poplawski
Has anyone looked into building odf-converter for Fedora?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
15 years, 6 months
RFC: Fedora signing server design
by Miloslav Trmač
Hello,
I'm working on a signing server for Fedora that stores keys and
passphrases without making them directly accessible to everybody who
should be able to sign data with Fedora keys, and I'd appreciate a
review of the design.
The current design is at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mitr , with
detailed protocol specifications linked at the end of the page.
Thanks,
Mirek
15 years, 6 months
Translation packagers: Rebuild before devel freeze
by Dimitris Glezos
Reminding maintainers of Fedora-translatable packages to issue a build
before the Development Freeze of tomorrow, 28/10, in order to have all
translations submitted until the translation deadline of 21/10
included in Fedora 10 (otherwise our translator's hard work will go to
the gutter). If you haven't received any translations since the last
build, a rebuild is not necessary.
Feel free to drop an email to fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com if you have
any questions.
Thanks for caring for translations*. (=
-δ
*and, subsequently, 60%+ of our users.
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
15 years, 6 months
ViewVC has been split into viewvc/viewvc-httpd
by Bojan Smojver
Just a heads up that as of today, ViewVC has been split into viewvc
(which depends on webserver) and viewvc-httpd (which depends on
mod_python), in order to address bug #457691.
So, if you are running viewvc under Apache/mod_python on F8/F9, you'll
have to install viewvc-httpd package in F10 to get the same thing.
--
Bojan
15 years, 6 months
help required for thoggen
by Rakesh Pandit
http://thoggen.net/
Can we have it in fedora. It rips DVD and supports Ogg/Theora (supported).
Later on they are planning to add support to AVI/divx/mpeg4 And the
required gstream codecs are on Livna or RPMFusion
The program is very good and useful. So, I wanted it in.
I am not sure about whether it legally acceptable?
Comments ?
--
rakesh
15 years, 6 months
Evolution Junk Mail errors
by Mike Chambers
I asked before and someone else stated that they were seeing junk mail
errors as well. I removed evolution-bogofilter for the time beeing.
Any others seeing this as well? Wondering if I need to use a brand new
evolution settings from scratch instead of using backups all the time.,
and might not see the errors?
--
Mike Chambers
Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
mikec302(a)fedoraproject.org
15 years, 6 months
Re: rpms/libcaca/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 libcaca.spec, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.3, 1.4
by Mamoru Tasaka
Matthias Saou wrote, at 10/27/2008 07:21 PM +9:00:
> Author: thias
>
> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/libcaca/devel
> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6826
>
> Modified Files:
> .cvsignore libcaca.spec sources
> Log Message:
> Update to 0.99beta16.
With this change:
[root@localhost i386]# rpm -qp --provides libcaca-0.99-0.4.beta11.fc9.i386.rpm
warning: libcaca-0.99-0.4.beta11.fc9.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 0b86274e
libcaca.so.0
libcucul.so.0
libcaca = 0.99-0.4.beta11.fc9
[root@localhost i386]# rpm -qp --provides libcaca-0.99-0.5.beta16.fc10.i386.rpm
libcaca++.so.0
libcaca.so.0
libcaca = 0.99-0.5.beta16.fc10
libcaca(x86-32) = 0.99-0.5.beta16.fc10
[root@localhost i386]# repoquery --repoid=koji-10 --whatrequires libcucul.so.0
xine-lib-extras-0:1.1.15-2.fc10.i386
Mamoru
15 years, 6 months
OpenOffice and go-oo
by Aidan Delaney
Dear all,
Has there been any discussion of why Fedora ships a relatively stock
(stock + 98 patches) OO.o rather than shipping go-oo? I must quickly
state that I'm not interested in starting a flamewar. I've seen the
extended feature set provided by go-oo such as the opengl slide
transitions and I wonder what the rationale for shipping stock+patches
is over shipping go-oo. Particularly when go-oo appears to contain a
superset of the Fedora OO.o patches.
--
Aidan Delaney
15 years, 6 months
Blocking bug in Bodhi
by Patrick Monnerat
Hi list,
There is a bug in Bodhi that prevents me to submit an update. I
submitted a bug report at https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/253,
without reaction.
Here is the problem: after having submitted an update request for
ocspd-1.5.1-0.3.rc1.fc9, I wanted to alter this request using the web
interface: all tentatives leaded to "500 internal error". I thus decided
to cancel+delete the request, then recreate it. But re-creation is
impossible: when attempting it, error message "ocspd-1.5.1-0.3.rc1.fc9
update already exists!" is displayed, although the previous update
request has been deleted. When clicking on the link in the error
message, an empty list with message "There are no updates for
ocspd-1.5.1-0.3.rc1.fc9" is displayed.
As a consequence, I can't submit this update anymore. Please help !
Thanks in advance
15 years, 6 months
