November 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Fedora updates-20181105.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181104.1): ID: 305030 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305030 ID: 305031 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305031 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

openmpi dependency problem?

by Richard Shaw

I've been working on getting a good build of FreeCAD 0.17 in Fedora (long story) and I was finally able to get a good scratch build on Rawhide so I decided to do a local mock build for Fedora 28 so I could actually test the package... As expected it built fine but I can't install it due to a dependency on libmpi... # dnf install ./freecad-0.17-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm ./freecad-data-0.17-2.fc28.noarch.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:30 ago on Sat 03 Nov 2018 07:21:52 AM CDT. Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides libmpi.so.20()(64bit) needed by freecad-1:0.17-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 2: package freecad-data-1:0.17-2.fc28.noarch requires freecad = 1:0.17-2.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides libmpi.so.20()(64bit) needed by freecad-1:0.17-2.fc28.x86_64 So what's the deal? Looking at the detailed requirements: $ rpm -qp --requires freecad-0.17-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm | grep mpi libmpi.so.20()(64bit) libmpi_cxx.so.20()(64bit) And the detail provides of the openmpi package: $ rpm -q --provides openmpi | grep libmpi libmpi.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) libmpi_cxx.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) libmpi_java.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) libmpi_mpifh.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) libmpi_usempif08.so.20()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) Why is there a difference? What is the significance of the appended (openmpi-x86_64)? Is that the problem? Thanks, Richard

5 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

[Re-review]LuxRender renamed luxcorerender

by Luya Tshimbalanga

Upstream LuxRender changed its name to LuxCoreRender. The source package is submitted for re-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645913 . Massive cleanup from the old LuxRender.spec is done. It does not include the new macros found on the development release yet but it is easy setup in that mind. A strange bug during the build triggered a DUP FUNXC as highlighted on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645828 but can be safely ignored. Luya

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Self Introduction: Carmen

by Carmen Bianca Bakker

Hi all, The contribution guide thingamajig told me to post a short message here. So as follows: I am Carmen from Friesland, The Netherlands. I am currently working on GNOME to make the GNOME desktop available in Esperanto. At the current rate, GNOME 3.32 will have its core release (standard apps, core libraries) completely translated into Esperanto, which I am fairly proud of :-) Furthermore, I am a former intern of the Free Software Foundation Europe where I worked on the REUSE Initiative (<https://reuse.software/>;). You can find me at the FSFE booth at SFScon in Bozen/Bolzano, 16 November. I am joining this list to make sure that `langpacks-eo` will become available in Fedora 30. If someone knows some pointers for me there while I (slowly) work on it, I would greatly appreciate those. Thanks and with kindness, Carmen

5 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

Wayland hangs (black screen) after dnf update to Fedora 29

by Alain Vigne

Hi everyone TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29. Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when I want to login to my Gnome session :( The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I enter my password, the screen turns black, and the keyboard is locked (non-responsive, Num Lock does not toggle, nor caps lock). Then I don't know how to recover control, as no key binding is effective, no mouse, no screen :(I power off the machine) I successfully launched the desktop using "startx" from my user account after booting with runlevel=3, so I think there is an issue with Wayland ! > lspci|grep "VGA" 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] (rev a1) I used to install the nvidia drivers, after each kernel upgrade. I did that, as usual using: > ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-410.73.run Where should I look to have more information about what's wrong with my system ? Which component should I report on BZ ? What additional info would be helpful for knowledgeable developers ? Thanks for your help Best regards -- Alain V.

5 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

Fedora testing-20181104.1 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) ID: 304931 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304931 ID: 304932 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304932 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora updates-20181104.1 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181102.0): ID: 304929 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304929 ID: 304930 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304930 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

DUP FUNXC

by Luya Tshimbalanga

While scratch build LuxCoreRender, I hit an endless loop of "DUP FUNXC" using rpmbuild and koji. It appears a bug on rpm as highlighted on https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30651816. Can someone verify with the attached spec file and what will be the solution? Luya

5 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

orphaning compiz stack

by Wolfgang Ulbrich

I just orphaned whole the compiz stack. - compiz - compiz-plugins-main - compiz-plugins-extra - compiz-plugins-experimental - compiz-manager - compizconfig-python - compiz-bcop - emerald - emerald-themes - fusion-icon - ccsm - simple-ccsm I don't use those packages for myself any more and i maintain to much packages. Honestly, i don't have any motivation more to maintain a package only just for fun. Compiz is nearly bug free and well maintained by the compiz-reloaded project at gitlab. Feel free to catch up the packages. cheers Wolfgang

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

HDF4 update to the release 4.2.14

by Antonio Trande

Hi all. I'm going to update HDF to the release 4.2.14 on f29+. If your need to test it before, this is the scratch build just done on fc30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30641568 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel November 2018