March 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Randy Barlow

Greetings fellow Fedorans! I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place for the Fedora 29 timeframe. As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could use Bodhi on Rawhide, similar to how we use it for our stable/branched releases, with more relaxed rules (perhaps 1 day in testing or something simple). It may be possible to automate the process a bit to make it less heavy for developers, though there is some complication for multi-package updates (more on that in a bit). For simple package updates, we may be able to detect new commits on dist-git, and react to those by automatically starting a Koji build, and automatically filing a Bodhi update when that build is complete. I think that would be pretty nice, and pingou created a PoC[0] to do this about a year ago. Multi-package updates won't be so easy though. It's not uncommon for us to need to update packages together, and the above workflow would be problematic since it would result in updates with single packages in them rather than updates with multiple packages. Of course, buildroot overrides would be a problem too, since multi-package updates often depend on each other at build time too. We could create some way for packagers to indicate that a commit (or possibly even a whole repo) is not intended to be "autobuilt/updated". If the packager indicates this then their builds would go into a rawhide-pending (similar to what we do for f27 today). Once they have all their builds (and buildroot overrides) the way they want them, they can create the update. Another idea that was tossed around in some chats I had with people about this involved a system for packagers to use to create Koji side tags. Bodhi manages BuildRoot Overrides today (with expirations), so perhaps Bodhi could be expanded to also manage Koji side tags (also with expirations). I can't remember all the details about this approach or why it was suggested over the former approach, but I wanted to list it to invite others to chew on it and see if it could work. If you have other suggestions on how we might gate packages in Rawhide that are wildly different than the above, please feel free to share! [0] https://pagure.io/fedobuild

6 years

20
74
0 / 0

Announcing DNF 3 development

by Daniel Mach

We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating the whole software management stack. Please read more details on our blog: https://rpm-software-management.github.io/announcement/2018/03/22/dnf-3-a...

6 years

22
33
0 / 0

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180329.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 28 Beta 1.3 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/137 (x86_64), 3/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 213956 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213956 ID: 213957 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213957 ID: 213971 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213971 ID: 214068 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214068 ID: 214086 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214086 Soft failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 2/23 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 213933 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213933 ID: 213934 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213934 ID: 213935 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213935 ID: 213941 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213941 ID: 213998 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/213998 ID: 214021 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214021 ID: 214038 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214038 ID: 214053 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214053 ID: 214055 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214055 ID: 214076 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214076 ID: 214077 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214077 ID: 214082 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214082 ID: 214083 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/214083 Passed openQA tests: 125/137 (x86_64), 18/23 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 162 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : F28 Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting - 2nd round

by jkurik＠redhat.com

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: F28 Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting - 2nd round on 2018-03-29 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9017/

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

by rawhide＠fedoraproject.org

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/28 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.3_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-28/f-28-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/ _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years

2
1
0 / 0

Re: Fedora 28 minimum memory requirement, review

by Joonas Sarajärvi

William Moreno kirjoitti 23.03.2018 klo 01:34: > I a computer without a SSD Plasma and Gnome Shell do not work well, so > in the current state os those desktop enviroments the page also should > recomend to use a SSD disck, is not use a alternative desktop like > Cinnamon or a more clasical option like Mate. I am not sure of how useful anecdotes about this are, but anyway in my experience Gnome is just fine with the rotating disks that my desktop has. Of course it starts noticeably faster from SSD storage, but the difference is not dramatic enough to make me wonder if I should switch to an other environment on this system.

6 years

3
3
0 / 0

Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): poppler (libpoppler.so.73 -> libpoppler.so.74)

by Adam Williamson

poppler was updated from 0.62.0-2 to 0.63.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-03-23. This update bumped the soname from libpoppler.so.73 to libpoppler.so.74. This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be. poppler has many dependencies. This is the list dtardon posted last time he correctly announced an soname bump: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler-sharp texlive texworks These and their dependencies are now all broken. This may well break Rawhide composes until key dependencies are rebuilt. Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate rebuilds. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

6 years

9
13
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!

by rawhide＠fedoraproject.org

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/28 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Beta_1.2_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-28/f-28-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/ _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years

2
2
0 / 0

asymptote segfaulting in rawhide/f28, maybe gcc issue?

by Tom Callaway

I'm not sure if this is a gcc issue or not, but asymptote segfaults in some situations (which is causing the FTBFS, since it bootstraps itself with itself). I filed a bug upstream with the crash and gdb backtrace: https://github.com/vectorgraphics/asymptote/issues/62 If any gcc c++ people could look at it, I would appreciate it. It's one of the few FTBFS bugs I have left. ~tom

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel March 2018