September 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180909.n.0 changes

by Fedora Branched Report

OLD: Fedora-29-20180907.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180909.n.0 ===== SUMMARY ===== Added images: 2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages: 0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages: 0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B ===== ADDED IMAGES ===== Image: AtomicHost vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20180909.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: AtomicHost vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20180909.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box ===== DROPPED IMAGES ===== Image: Workstation raw-xz armhfp Path: Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-29-20180907.n.0-sda.raw.xz ===== ADDED PACKAGES ===== ===== DROPPED PACKAGES ===== ===== UPGRADED PACKAGES ===== ===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

pam_cgfs.so support for Fedora?

by Daniel Walsh

Has anyone looked at supporting pam_cgfs.so in Fedora. This question was asked here. https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429

5 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

Self Introduction

by Manas Mangaonkar

Hello, My name is Manas,i am a Computer Engineering student at the University of Mumbai. i recently began packaging with my first package being this <https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/High_Performance_Clear_LInu...>,and would love to work on even more packages. I am wish to join the packager group,thus seeking sponsorship. You may find the bugzilla review request for my first package here <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620568>. Learned about the fedora community effort during Google summer of code,joined the mailing list saw a issue open and began working on it. Have been using various tux distro's since a teen always wanted to contribute,have been self taught. Learned the ropes of packaging using the irc fedora chat room. I am mostly interested in packaging and maintaining python packages as i use python a lot and would love to give back to the community. My Github <https://github.com/Pac23> - Manas Mangaonkar

5 years, 7 months

2
3
0 / 0

nonresponsive asio maintainers

by Julian Sikorski

Hi list, asio maintainers [1] seem to be unresponsive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551800 I have checked the corresponding FAS accounts using fedora-active-user and the maintainers do not appear to be very active: - uwog: last FAS login 2017-01-05 - pocock: last FAS login 2017-05-07 - fale: last FAS login 2018-02-11 Does anybody know how to contact any of the 3 gentlemen? Best regards, Julian [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-09-10 Fedora QA Meeting

by Adam Williamson

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're now in F29 Beta crunch time, so that's the main focus. There will be a blocker review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

F29 Call for testing: X crash when moving windows

by Adam Williamson

Hi folks! We have a proposed Beta blocker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269 We are not sure whether to make it a blocker as we are not sure how commonly it will affect people. There actually seem to be a few different but similar bugs involved at this point. It'd be great if folks could try the following operations: 1) Launch and then exit glxgears 2) Launch and then exit Chrome or Chromium 3) Launch Chrome or Chromium and then move its window around. If you have more than one display, move its window between displays and see if any of them causes a crash that looks something like the backtraces in the bug. Try this both with the packages from current stable F29, and with this xorg-x11-server scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29516394 and report back here or to the bug report. Thanks a lot! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] 2018-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

by Adam Williamson

# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-09-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers and 21 proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow. If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F29 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good night and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Fedora 29 Beta blocker status mail #1

by Adam Williamson

On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 10:05 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Adam, > > What is the position on openSSL 1.1.1? f29 currently has 1.1.1-0.pre9.1.fc29. There is no proposed FE for any later build. So far as blocker/FE process goes, that is all that is relevant. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora Rawhide-20180909.n.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 76/132 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180908.n.0): ID: 276675 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276675 ID: 276676 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276676 ID: 276678 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276678 ID: 276679 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276679 ID: 276688 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276688 ID: 276694 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276694 ID: 276695 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276695 ID: 276701 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276701 ID: 276702 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276702 ID: 276703 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276703 ID: 276704 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276704 ID: 276705 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276705 ID: 276707 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276707 ID: 276708 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276708 ID: 276718 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276718 ID: 276719 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276719 ID: 276720 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276720 ID: 276721 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276721 ID: 276722 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276722 ID: 276723 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276723 ID: 276724 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276724 ID: 276725 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276725 ID: 276726 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276726 ID: 276730 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276730 ID: 276738 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276738 ID: 276739 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276739 ID: 276741 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276741 ID: 276742 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276742 ID: 276743 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276743 ID: 276744 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276744 ID: 276745 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276745 ID: 276746 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276746 ID: 276747 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276747 ID: 276748 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276748 ID: 276749 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276749 ID: 276750 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276750 ID: 276751 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276751 ID: 276752 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276752 ID: 276753 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276753 ID: 276756 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276756 ID: 276757 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276757 ID: 276758 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276758 ID: 276759 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276759 ID: 276760 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276760 ID: 276762 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276762 ID: 276763 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276763 ID: 276765 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276765 ID: 276766 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276766 ID: 276767 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276767 ID: 276768 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276768 ID: 276769 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276769 ID: 276770 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276770 ID: 276771 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276771 ID: 276772 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276772 ID: 276773 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276773 ID: 276774 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276774 ID: 276775 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276775 ID: 276776 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276776 ID: 276777 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276777 ID: 276778 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276778 ID: 276785 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276785 ID: 276786 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276786 ID: 276787 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276787 ID: 276788 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276788 ID: 276790 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276790 ID: 276791 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276791 ID: 276792 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276792 ID: 276793 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276793 ID: 276794 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276794 ID: 276795 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276795 ID: 276796 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276796 ID: 276797 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276797 ID: 276798 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276798 ID: 276799 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276799 ID: 276800 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276800 ID: 276801 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276801 ID: 276802 Test: x86_64 universal install_updates_img_local URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276802 ID: 276803 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276803 ID: 276807 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276807 ID: 276808 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276808 ID: 276809 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276809 ID: 276810 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276810 ID: 276811 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276811 ID: 276813 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276813 ID: 276816 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276816 ID: 276817 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276817 ID: 276818 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276818 ID: 276819 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276819 ID: 276820 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276820 ID: 276821 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276821 ID: 276822 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276822 ID: 276823 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276823 ID: 276824 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276824 ID: 276825 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276825 ID: 276826 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276826 ID: 276827 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276827 ID: 276828 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276828 ID: 276829 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276829 ID: 276830 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276830 ID: 276831 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276831 ID: 276832 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276832 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20180908.n.0): ID: 276764 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276764 ID: 276783 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276783 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20180908.n.0): ID: 276780 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276780 Passed openQA tests: 15/132 (x86_64) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20180908.n.0): ID: 276754 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276754 ID: 276781 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276781 Skipped openQA tests: 39 of 158 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Fedora 29 Beta blocker status mail #1

by Peter Robinson

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:06 PM Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote: > > Adam, > > What is the position on openSSL 1.1.1? > > The openSSL team has targeted Sept 11 as the release date, and I have > not seen any other word on the user list. Of course there may be > different discussion elsewhere. > > For all the features of TLS 1.3, you want openSSL 1.1.1. > > Speaking of TLS 1.3, I don't know what else needs to be done for support > of it, but there is an intentional change in versions from the draft to > the RFC... All of the above is up to the openssl maintainer, it would still be available in updates-testing for use anyway. > Disclaimer: I have a personal need of 1.1.1, as the PR that addressed > my problems with creating EDDSA certs did not make the pre9 version, but > it is in the master now. > > Bob > > On 9/7/18 8:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! As we've only got a week to go for Beta, here's an update on > > blocker bug status. > > > > tl;dr action summary > > ==================== > > > > Accepted blockers > > ----------------- > > > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524 > > ACTION: QA / reporter to verify whether fixed in 3.2.0-2.fc29 > > > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540 > > ACTION: dnf team to fix bug and send out update > > > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167 > > ACTION: FESCo to decide on how much fixing is needed > > > > 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615969 > > ACTION: nirik to build for for f29 and edit update > > > > 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572916 > > ACTION: kernel team to report whether anything still needed > > > > Proposed blockers > > ----------------- > > > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624972 > > ACTION: blocker reviewers to vote on status, QA to verify fix > > > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626413 > > ACTION: bcl to ensure fix is ready in case of need > > > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269 > > ACTION: adamw to send out call-for-testing mail > > > > Bug-by-bug detail > > ================= > > > > Accepted blockers > > ----------------- > > > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524 - dnf - POST > > dnf doesn't follow default profile for an enabled non-default stream > > > > This is reported to be fixed in 3.3.0, but I'm not 100% sure if it's > > fixed in 3.2.0-2.fc29, the build currently in F29. I've asked for > > clarification in the bug. > > > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540 - dnf - ASSIGNED > > RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Exec failed: no such table: main.trans_cmdline > > > > This is one of several crasher bugs reported with DNF 3+ which seem to > > relate to the history database. This one has a clear reproducer in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596540#c30 , and dmach > > committed to a fix there. We are waiting on that fix. > > > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167 - dnf - NEW > > dnf doesn't record modular metadata in a local database > > > > This one was referred to FESCo: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1974 . It > > will be discussed on Monday, and a decision made about to what extent > > it needs to be addressed for Beta and/or Final. > > > > 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615969 - grub2 - VERIFIED > > AArch64 - Error when booting "error: out of memory." > > > > This was fixed by grub2-2.02-52.fc29, but that build is the one which > > broke many x86_64 UEFI installs and thus was unpushed. We need a new > > grub2 build which retains the fix for this bug and also fixes the > > x86_64 UEFI bug. As pjones is apparently away ATM, I have asked nirik > > if he can do this. > > > > 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572916 - kernel - NEW > > kernel after 4.17.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc29 waits for random entropy on boot > > > > This one's been sitting on the blocker list a long time, I'm not > > sure if anything more is needed here. I have asked the kernel folks for > > an update. > > > > Proposed blockers > > ----------------- > > > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624972 - lightdm - MODIFIED > > No GUI desktop > > > > This looks like a clear blocker (Xfce ARM image failing to boot - Xfce > > is the blocking desktop on 32-bit ARM), but it also seems like a > > probable fix has been identified and we only need to push it. > > > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626413 - lorax - NEW > > Add dependency on librepo > > > > It seems that lorax has a librepo dep it does not express, but this was > > hidden by dnf depending on librepo; apparently newer dnf builds no > > longer do, so lorax needs to express the dependency. This is > > technically not a blocker so long as the newer dnf builds aren't > > actually in stable themselves, but as we're likely to need one to fix > > the accepted DNF blockers, we'll want to have the lorax fix ready to > > go. > > > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269 - xorg-x11-server - NEW > > [abrt] xorg-x11-server-Xwayland: OsLookupColor(): Display server crashed > > > > This is a graphical environment crash which is clearly hardware- > > dependent to some degree. We need to find out how many other folks are > > running into it in order to decide whether it's a blocker. I will send > > out a call-for-testing email about this one soon. > > > > Thanks folks! > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel September 2018