F35 Change: libmemcached-awesome (Self-Contained Change proposal)
by Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libmemcached-awesome
== Summary ==
Switch from libmemcached to libmemcached-awesome
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]]
* Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org
== Detailed Description ==
libmemcache 1.0.18 was released in February 2014, so hasn't received
an update for 7 years.
libmemcache-awesome is a fork providing same libraries, tools with
API/ABI compatibility.
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Rely on a maintained project.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Check Koschei status. Test with latest version to
ensure compatibility. Work with upstream on bug fixing. Needed mass
rebuild (C extensions) done by change owner.
* Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== How To Test ==
* install and play with your application
== User Experience ==
Developers and system administrators will have the great benefit or
running a maintained library.
== Dependencies ==
All php-* packages (and some *-php)
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: Drop not compatible packages.
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== Documentation ==
* [https://awesomized.github.io/libmemcached/ Upstream documentation]
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
2 years, 9 months
Can't log into release-monitoring.org?
by Richard Shaw
Currently I can't use my Fedora login on release-monitoring.org...
Error: There was an error during authentication 'Authentication process
canceled', please check the provided url.
Is this a known problem?
Thanks,
Richard
2 years, 9 months
Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
by Jakub Kadlcik
Hello fellow Fedora people,
Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I
would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The
discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers.
I have a website ready to be deployed. If you are interested in the
technical details, please see this RFE
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470
and also the code
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors
The page design is as simple as possible. You can see some screenshots
here.
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470#comment-735105
A very important feature to me is grouping sponsors by their areas of
interests / expertise, and I would like to ask for your help in this
matter.
At this moment, I have manually defined areas such as Python, C/C++,
Haskell, Ruby, Functional programming, Web development, Modularity,
etc and manually assigned people to them (the small number, that I
personally know that do these kinds of things).
Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie
people to them based on some already existing information within the
Fedora infrastructure?
Otherwise, we will have to stick with manually defined groups, which is
fine with me. But in that case I would like to ask you, what areas of
interest you would like to see. And if you are a Fedora packager
sponsor, in what areas would you like to be listed?
Thank you,
Jakub
2 years, 9 months
Undetected ABI change in libkcapi (rawhide)
by Simo Sorce
Hello,
I just rebased libkcapi in Rawhide, without realizing there was an ABI
change.
The ABI change should affect only S390 but I am discussing with the
author on handling this better given the library does use symbol
versioning.
So I may "revert" this ABI change in short order.
Apologies if any build will have issues between today and when I will
be able to handle it, if you have any concerns please let me know.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc
2 years, 9 months
Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-07-12)
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-07-12 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2629 F35 Change: MinGW environment and toolchain update
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2629
APPROVED (+5, 0, 0)
#2627 F35 Change: Libvirt Modular Daemons
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2627
APPROVED (+5, 0, 0)
#2626 F35 Change: Remove authselect-compat package
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2626
APPROVED (+4,0,-0)
#2630 F35 Change: libmemcached-awesome
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2630
= Followups =
= New business =
#2624 Proposal: Ban bots from submitting non-scratch koji builds
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2624
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
2 years, 9 months
Current minimal base image for containers?
by Martin Langhoff
Hi Fedora Devel,
is there any current equivalent of Fedora atomic, or the super-compact
RHEL-7 minimal container images? IIRC those were _really_ small (ie:
~70MB) in size, had been installed with nodocs, etc.
Couldn't find a CoreOS _minimal container_ image either. Current
Fedora 34 minimal container image is 120MB.
regards,
martin
--
martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com
- ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff
- don't be distracted ~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff
by shiny stuff
2 years, 9 months