can't install package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit
by Martin Gansser
Hi,
when trying to install pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit i get this error message:
# dnf -y install pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit
Last metadata expiration check: 1:39:52 ago on Thu Dec 31 14:10:39 2020.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.14-5.fc33.x86_64
- package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-0.3.13-4.fc33.i686 conflicts with jack-audio-connection-kit provided by jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.14-5.fc33.x86_64
- conflicting requests
- package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-0.3.15-2.fc33.i686 conflicts with jack-audio-connection-kit provided by jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.14-5.fc33.x86_64
- package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-0.3.13-4.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with jack-audio-connection-kit provided by jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.14-5.fc33.x86_64
- package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-0.3.15-2.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with jack-audio-connection-kit provided by jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.14-5.fc33.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
How can i fix this ?
Regards
Martin
1 year, 1 month
Planning to start unifying native and mingw packages
by Sandro Mani
Hi
Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm
planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be
looking at these packages where I maintain both variants:
eigen3 mingw-eigen3
enchant2 mingw-enchant2
freeimage mingw-freeimage
gdal mingw-gdal
GeographicLib mingw-GeographicLib
geos mingw-geos
giflib mingw-giflib
gtkspell3 mingw-gtkspell3
gtkspellmm30 mingw-gtkspellmm30
jxrlib mingw-jxrlib
leptonica mingw-leptonica
libgeotiff mingw-libgeotiff
libimagequant mingw-libimagequant
libkml mingw-libkml
librttopo mingw-librttopo
libspatialite mingw-libspatialite
libwebp mingw-libwebp
openjpeg2 mingw-openjpeg2
OpenSceneGraph mingw-OpenSceneGraph
osgearth mingw-osgearth
podofo mingw-podofo
proj mingw-proj
python-pillow mingw-python-pillow
qtspell mingw-qtspell
shapelib mingw-shapelib
svg2svgt mingw-svg2svgt
tesseract mingw-tesseract
uriparser mingw-uriparser
I'm performing test builds here [1]. Once I've got them all building
there, if there are no objections, I plan to push to F37 and retire all
the corresponding mingw repos.
Sandro
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-unified-spec/builds/
1 year, 1 month
FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for
by David Cantrell
Hi,
Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
Rather than guess, we wanted to ask the community what you use i686 packages
for in Fedora. There are no wrong answers here. We are seeking information.
Why? Since the removal of the i686 kernel in Fedora, we want to reduce the
number of i686 packages provided in the repo. As time marches on, the ability
to build a lot of things for i686 becomes unrealistic or even impossible.
Remember it goes beyond providing builds...providing support, bug fixes, and
security fixes for those packages too. Maybe some things using i686 packages
now can move to x86_64 packages. We do not know yet, but a goal is to figure
out what packages, if anything, can drop their i686 builds.
NOTE: Nothing is changing now. We are in an information gathering phase.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
Thanks,
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
1 year, 2 months
"rescue" boot entry files are not updated on OS upgrades
by Chris Murphy
Summary----------
Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
stale as a Fedora installation ages. This kernel's modules are
eventually deleted, and if selected at boot time, the typical user
experience is a dracut shell.
Basic background-------------
(skip this section if you know how it works)
During a new installation, a single kernel version is installed. e.g.
vmlinuz-5.17.0-0.rc4.96.fc36.x86_64 which is then duplicated as e.g.
vmlinuz-0-rescue-3a86878de5d649a983916543ece7bb7e.
Each of those (identical) kernels has an initramfs file:
initramfs-5.17.0-0.rc4.96.fc36.x86_64.img
initramfs-0-rescue-3a86878de5d649a983916543ece7bb7e.img
The sole difference is the first one is a smaller host-only initramfs,
the second one is a larger no host-only initramfs created with `dracut
-N`. The bigger one just contains a bunch of extra kernel modules and
dracut scripts, ostensibly to make it more likely to boot a system
with some change in hardware that the host-only initramfs doesn't
contain. The size of this rescue initramfs is around 100 MiB, with the
common day to day "host only" initramfs being around 33 MiB. [1]
As the system is updated, additional kernel versions are installed.
dnf.conf contains installonly_limit=3, which results in a maximum of
three kernel versions being installed at a time. Once a fourth kernel
is installed, the first kernel and its modules are removed from
/usr/lib/modules. The rescue kernel+initramfs pair are never updated
or upgraded, even during system upgrades.
Observations------------
This has been discussed by the Workstation working group [2] but since
this functionality is present in all of Fedora, we're moving the
discussion for greater visibility.
There's two separate complaints, if you will: (a) that the
kernel+initramfs pair are never update or upgraded for the life of the
installation; and (b) that even during one release cycle, the user
experience when booting the rescue entry, changes, i.e. when the
matching /usr/lib/modules for the rescue entry are present early on,
you do get a full runtime behavior, you will get to a graphical
environment. But then once the version matched /usr/lib/modules are
removed, you get a completely different behavior when booting the
rescue entry.
An important note from that ticket from Justin Forbes, the Fedora
kernel maintainer: " Remember, the only real purpose of the rescue
kernel is to get your system out of something completely unusable. It
isn't meant to be a full runtime."
Questions------------
* Considering the very narrow purpose of the entry, maybe the current
behavior is adequate?
* Does the rescue entry reliably get users to a dracut prompt, rather
than indefinite hang? I don't know whether it does.
* Is there any way to improve the situation without increasing the
risk that the rescue entry becomes totally non-functional?
* The chosen kernel version needs to be based on one that is known
to boot. Currently we know the kernel+initramfs pair work because it's
the same version used to boot the installation media when doing the
initial provisioning. We don't actually know an updated replacement
"no host-only" initramfs will work until it's tried. Is it possible to
automate this? And is it worth the risk, or even figuring out how to
assess the risk?
* At Flock 2021, Zbyszek proposed "Building Initrd Images from
RPMs" to reduce the complexity of building initramfs, maybe there's a
role for it here? More: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GATg_bqmASc
* What happens if we accept some scope creep, and go for many
improvements that make the extra work worth it?
* What about the unsigned nature of the initramfs? Should we be
creating initramfs's in Fedora infra and signing them?
* Stuff a graphical rescue environment into the initramfs? (This
might be ten leaps too far, but it's intended to encourage thinking
with a vivid imagination.)
[1] both values from a recent Fedora 36 Workstation installation
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/259
--
Chris Murphy
1 year, 3 months
Orphaned X11 packages
by Adam Jackson
The following packages, previously owned by xgl-maint, are now up for grabs:
xorg-x11-xfs
xorg-sgml-doctools
xorg-x11-drv-v4l
xorg-x11-xsm
xorg-x11-twm
xorg-x11-drv-sisusb
xorg-x11-xdm
xorg-x11-docs
Upstream development on all of these is pretty much nil, so if you're
serious about picking up any of these you may also wish to take on the
module upstream:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg
- ajax
1 year, 3 months
fedpkg clone fails with Permission denied (publickey).
by Richard Shaw
Long story short I lost my home directory where I do all of my packager
activities (separate from my main user) so I'm setting things up from
scratch.
I created new ssh keys and uploaded the public key to
admin.fedoraproject.org and pasted into pagure.io. It's been over an hour
and I'm still getting:
$ fedpkg clone hamlib
Cloning into 'hamlib'...
hobbes1069(a)pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
I've also updated my API tokens, which is STILL not well documented. I
pasted them in the appropriate spot in "/etc/rpkg/fedpkg.conf" which isn't
real intuitive.
Thanks,
Richard
1 year, 4 months
F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)
by Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Transition from Fedora's short name of licenses to standardized
[https://spdx.org/licenses/ SPDX license]
[https://spdx.dev/specifications/ formula].
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
* Name: [[User:jlovejoy| Jilayne Lovejoy]]
* Name: [[User:ngompa| Neal Gompa]]
* Name: [[User:dcantrell| David Cantrell]]
* Name: [[User:rfontanaref| Richard Fontana]]
* Name: [[User:mattdm| Matthew Miller]]
<!-- Include you email address that you can be reached should people
want to contact you about helping with your change, status is
requested, or technical issues need to be resolved. If the change
proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person.
-->
* Email: msuchy(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, jlovejoy(a)redhat.com,
ngompa13(a)gmail.com, rfontana(a)redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
In the past, Fedora decided to use short names for licenses. Although
we documented the short names very well. The identifiers were never
standard. In the meantime, SPDX identifiers become standard, and
[https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Business_Team/Adoption other SW vendors
start using it].
In this phase, we want to provide documentation and tooling to allow
maintainers to begin using SPDX license ids instead of the old Fedora
short names. This move is opt-in. There will be
[[Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_2|Phase 2]], where we identify the
remaining packages and help them to migrate to the SPDX formula.
== Feedback ==
Ancient [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.o...
feedback from SPDX organization].
Summary from [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/search?q=spdx&page=1&mlist=legal...
fedora-legal mailing list]: we want this to happen, but this is big
scope and likely will happen over more than one release.
Summary from packaging-committee:
* [https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/971#]: older PR
to change packaging guidelines
* [https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1142]: present
PR that needs more updating
Summary from devel-list: TBD
== Benefit to Fedora ==
The use of a standardized identifier for license will align Fedora
with other distributions. And allows efficient and reliable
identification of licenses.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners (things sorted by done/todo and by priorities):
** Miroslav Suchý: license-fedora2spdx - done
** Jilayne Lovejoy: map rest of Fedora licenses to SPDX ids - done
** David Cantrell: create machine-readable format and new repo - done
** David Cantrell: merge mapping of Fedora licenses to SPDX ids to new
data format/repo - done
** Richard Fontana & Jilayne Lovejoy: review update all licensing info
and legal pages in wiki - in process
** Jilayne Lovejoy & Richard Fontana: create and populate new Docs
pages for legal and licensing info - in process
** Miroslav Suchy - create
[https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data
fedora-license-data package] (with data from rpminspect-data-fedora) -
TODO
** David Cantrell: separate licenses from rpminspect-data-fedora
[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077914 BZ 2077914] -
TODO
** Miroslav Suchý: allow `license-validate` to use spdx - TODO
** David Cantrell: generate from license data to new Docs page similar
to [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List
Licensing:Main]
** SOMEBODY: create a webhook that updates Docs page after the merge
to fedora-license-data - TODO
** Jilayne Lovejoy: prepare PR for updates to packaging guidelines -
in the process [https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1142]
** SOMEBODY: help maintainers who want to change license string to
SPDX identifiers proactively.
* Out of Scope: In this phase, we do not target to move **all**
packages to SPDX identifiers. That will be done in
[[Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_2|Phase 2]]. In
[[Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_2|Phase 2]] we will identify the
remaining packages and open BZ or PR.
* Other developers:
Early adopters can migrate their License tag to the SPDX identifiers.
Proposal owners will gather feedback and will work on potential
problems.
We want to have all bits ready so that maintainers can start changing
the spec files just after Fedora 37 branching (summer 2022).
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: Licensing page, packaging guidelines has to
be altered.
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives:
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
License strings are not used anything in run time. This change will
not affect the upgrade or runtime of Fedora.
During the transition period, developer tools like rpminspect,
licensecheck, etc. may produce false negatives. And we have to define
a date where we flip these tools from old Fedora's short names to the
SPDX formula.
== How To Test ==
Users should not need any testing. These steps are for package maintainers:
* Fetch your license string from `License` tag in SPEC file.
* Test that your current Fedora's short name is correct. E.g.
$ license-validate -v 'MIT or GPLv1'
Approved license
* Convert license string to SPDX formula:
$ license-fedora2spdx 'MIT or GPLv1'
Warning: more options how to interpret MIT. Possible options:
['Adobe-Glyph', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-CMU', 'HPND', 'HPND', 'no-spdx-yet
(MIT license (also X11))', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ',
'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'mpich2']
mpich2 or GPL-1.0-only
In this example, the short name `GPLv1` can be converted straight to
`GPL-1.0-only`. But short name `MIT` stands for several licenses with
different [https://spdx.org/licenses/ SPDX identifiers]. You have to
examine what license is package actually using. `license-fedora2spdx`
will try to convert the formula and use one of the options but without
any heuristics. You need to manually review the license.
You can check if SPDX formula is correct using:
$ license-validate -v --file FIXME "MIT-CMU or GPL-1.0-only"
== User Experience ==
Users should be able to use standard software tools that audit
licenses. E.g. for Software Bills of Materials.
== Dependencies ==
No other dependencies.
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: In this first phase, if something goes wrong,
we can 'git revert' each change in dist-git. It is expected that in
the first phase, there will be only a few packages altered. It may be
a few hundred, but it is still doable to revert.
* Contingency deadline: Beta freeze. But it is expected that not all
packages will be converted by that time and the change will continue
in the next release.
* Blocks release? No. This change has no impact on runtime of any package.
== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== Release Notes ==
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
1 year, 6 months
tinyxml2 soname bump
by Rich Mattes
Hi,
I'm planning on upgrading tinyxml2 to version 9 in rawhide in the coming
week, which will include a soname bump. Affected packages are:
Macaulay2-0:1.19.1-2.fc37.src
bullet-0:3.08-3.fc36.src
cppcheck-0:2.7.4-1.fc37.src
dvblinkremote-0:0.2.0-0.25.beta.fc36.src
gazebo-0:10.1.0-27.fc36.src
linbox-0:1.6.3-11.fc36.src
vdr-epg2vdr-0:1.2.7-1.fc37.src
vdr-osd2web-0:0.2.54-12.fc37.src
I'll take care of the rebuilds in a side tag.
Rich
1 year, 6 months
