Hello folks,
this is just a reminder that there is a Fedora Packager Dashboard that you
might not know about:
Go to https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
Enter your FAS username, (sit down and relax for a while if coming for the
first time) and enjoy aggregated information about your Fedora and EPEL
packages from:
- Bugzilla
- Bodhi
- ABRT
- Koschei
- src.fedoraproject.org PRs
- orphans reports
- non-installability reports
- Fedora release schedule
- Package calendars (currently GNOME and Python, but extensible)
- and possibly more in the future
With various filtering options.
Also works for FAS groups or custom views of multiple users that can be used
for triages, e.g.:
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?users=churchyard,pvi…
See the help page for more:
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/helpmepls
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
As I've been working on converting license tags to SPDX, I have found
myself frequently needing to determine the license for some file that
is not distributed by the package upstream, such as JavaScript and CSS
files copied in by documentation builders, or header files from
header-only packages. To avoid figuring out the same license over and
over, I started taking notes. Over the past few days, I've been
tidying up my notes for consumption by someone other than me. Here
they are:
https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/license/
I hope this will be useful for some of you. Notes on the notes:
1. The Computer Modern font license is "Knuth", but that is the old license
name. There is an open issue to determine how to submit that license to
SPDX:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/18
It is unfortunate that this affects Computer Modern, which is the default
font used by TeX; it is likely that a very high percentage of PDF files
generated by TeX have these fonts embedded in them.
2. If you analyze anything on the list, please send me an email to tell me if
you came to the same conclusions about licenses. If you did, I will update
the page to note that a 2nd party verified the analysis. If you did not,
tell me how your analysis disagrees.
3. If you have similar notes for packages I don't have on the list, let's
combine our notes. This list should ultimately live on a Fedora-managed
web page. Right now it is still fairly incomplete.
4. Packages I hope to analyze soon: various Sphinx extensions, GAPDoc, and
hevea.
5. Having my face peeking at me from the top of all of my web pages is
starting to creep me out. I need to find another picture.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
Upstream has released a beta and plans to release mid-September. This will
be updated in Rawhide and maybe f37.
Affected packages:
blender
luxcorerender
OpenColorIO
openshadinglanguage
usd
All builds will be performed in a side tag.
Thanks,
Richrad