On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris <johnmh(a)splentity.com> wrote:
>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin of
>> Fedora which is affected by this decision.
>>
> The default firewall config affects every user of that edition, even
> if they never use GNOME (or even use graphical boot). So, I don't know
> if this would be adequate.
Why would you install Workstation if you didn't intend to use GNOME?
That would seem to be a reasonable question, but if it's possible to do
so then it is bound to happen... It may be a symptom of unclear definition.
If Workstation is going to require a graphical environment for
reasonable usage/administration/whatever, then it should be made
mandatory somehow. It would also help clarify that the Workstation,
Server, and <null> Products must be treated distinctly... and that you
shouldn't just point your kickstart file at whatever ISO you happen to
have laying around.
-jc