On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 11:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 02:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > That's about 44M worth of potential savings out of a 204M base
> > image, a
> > bit over 20%. I'll happily file proper bug reports for these
> > somewhere
> > if we want, but it took me like 30 minutes to look into this. If
> > you're
> > not even willing to put in _that_ little effort, then forgive me
> > for
> > not taking your assertion that "you simply cannot win" very
> > seriously.
>
> I am not the one who spent 2 months gaining 0.5%…
You're right, you spend two months achieving zero towards this goal,
and complaining about what progress they _have_ made. You have
provided
zero constructive feedback, and your defeatist attitude helps nobody.
Consider the option of not being gratuitously unpleasant.
It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness.
Writing a script that automates figuring out how many candles are
needed (and where) is also better than cursing the darkness.
Dave