On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
[big snip]
> To the outside
> > world, there is a strong impression that the thing called "Fedora" is a
> > product or set of products with a release number that gets released
> > every six months. The concept of "Fedora 33 release" or "Fedora 34
> > release" is a strong concept with all these sort of institutional
> > ripples.
> >
>
> And why cannot we make this evolve ? Is it bad to have a Fedora that has
> streams instead of versions ?
We can.
Can I ask that you please read my *whole* emails before writing your
replies? Or at least if you must reply in-line while reading, please
after you finish, go back and see if what you wrote earlier still
applies? All of this stuff up top is irrelevant because it's all based
on an assumption that I was saying FCOS must at all costs align with
existing processes and schedules, when I was not saying that at all. I
was just trying to outline the situation and the factors that need to
be considered.
Sorry if that came down that way, but I was trying to get a better understanding of your concerns.
I ll try to do better next time :-)
I'll reply to the stuff from lower down, where you actually engaged
with what I was actually saying, in a separate mail.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org