Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not,
> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot
> configured to always bootnext to Windows?
Pretty sure shim still hard codes the name grub$arch.efi as the 2nd
bootloader. Hence having to rename sd-boot as grubx64.efi for shim to find
and run it. They can't co-exist right now. Also, there's no current plan
by anyone to add systemd-boot for Secure Boot signing.
That is not what I suggested.
I suggested shim → GRUB → systemd-boot → Windows (and shim → GRUB → Fedora,
systemd-boot would be configured to always reboot to Windows, booting Fedora
from GRUB would bypass it entirely), not shim → systemd-boot → Windows.
Kevin Kofler