On 02/02/2014 07:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Solomon Peachy <pizza(a)shaftnet.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 11:06:18PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I don't understand why we are doing that "Fedora.NEXT" thing in
>> first place. It's a lot of change for the sake of change, without any
>> idea whether the output will be better than the status quo, or even
>> whether there will be any (usable) output at all!
> For what my opinion is worth (as someone who's been around since the
> RHL4.1 days) I have to agree.
I think this is a good summary of what it's all about and what it isn't.
Would you mind do summarize how you understand this in your own words?
To me this all reads as "Fedora.Next" is a marketing term for a
predefined set of packages aiming at certain arbitrary predefined
I regret, but I fail to find much sense in this.