On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:44:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Until this functionality is merged into pagure's dist-git plugin, there is
> a way, but it's a bit convoluted.
And it's too obscure. Instead, I just retired the two EPEL branches.
And we have to do that for every single package we maintain? That is
not
reasonable. It is Fedora policy that we cannot be forced to care about EPEL.
The software needs to actually implement that policy.
With pkgdb I could see who maintains which "branches" and which branches
exist. With this new web UI, I don't find where I could take a look at
who maintains which branch. For some packages I see socalled "members", a
"main admin", an "admin", people with "commit" access, but
without any idea
who maintains which branches.
All this would not even interest me at all, but almost a week ago someone
from Red Hat Security decided it would be a good idea to assign to me
(without asking first) ancient EPEL tickets, which are almost five years (!)
old. Apparently, no proper tracking of those tickets has been done for a
very long time. It is entirely wrong and unexpected to assign those EPEL
tickets to me only because something under the hood knows only a default
assignee or such.