Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
They shouldn't have to go through a re-review unless they've
let the
package sit in retirement for (I believe it's six months but someone else
might have the policy URL handy).
Only 3 months.
And if the package doesn't build, the maintainer is probably not going to
commit stuff to it until he can fix the build issue. It's a bit useless to
commit stuff you can't build…
Kevin Kofler