Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>>>>
>>> Other system configuration tools are more suited to do the basic
>>> functionality and not expose a lot of details. You could do it in a
>>> more comprehensive way but the UI should be designed to do the
>>> basic things in an easy way first
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Care to present me with some easily observed examples so that I
>> could better apply what you're suggesting to my problem?
>
>
>
> Sure. system-config-httpd only exposes basic functionality for
> example. GUI applications shouldnt be designed with the aim to expose
> all the configuration options but as task based systems. Figuring out
> what options fit into which task group would be a good idea. Try
> create some mockups using glade.
> regards
> Rahul
>
Will do.
Any followups on this one?
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers