On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Adam Williamson
<awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 09:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>> > I'm afraid I can't agree. I like the simplicity of the model
you're
>> > proposing, but from a practical point of view, there is still a commonly
>> > held perception that there is a 'product' called Fedora which is
>> > basically composed of what you get if you go to
get.fedoraproject.org,
>> > download one of the things we push at you there, and install it.
>> > Practically speaking, I believe we have to QA that 'thing called
Fedora'
>> > as a whole. I don't think your model quite matches what people
perceive
>> > Fedora to be.
>>
>> What's your definition of what people perceive Fedora to be?
>
> "What do we talk about when we talk about Fedora?" :)
>
> Well, we just did a major release. Go look on
news.google.com for
> "Fedora 19", or search for "Fedora 19 review", or just poke
through a
> few popular tech sites and forums.
>
> What do people do when they want to 'try Fedora 19'? They download the
> primary image on the download page, which is the desktop live, and run
> it. This is what they've _always_ done.
Hmm I wouldn't be surprised if we had more Fedora users running on
cloud instances now than we do on the desktop but there's no way to
tell really.
Might be the sites I'm reading, but I have yet to see a single post
anywhere even mentioning the cloud image, while I've replied to dozens
of posts of people testing the desktop live.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora