Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>>- updated xorg-x11 packaging to separate the Mesa GL stuff
>>- some sort of alternatives system or post-install scripts to
>> find correct provider of libGL.so.1
>This already works with the rpms.
It does not. That should have been libGL.so.
See my other mail for details.
nvidia should *not* be the provider for libGL.so, but MesaGL. Else you
end up with binaries that work only on/for nvidia users.
The Mesa libGL rpms conflict with the Nvidia ones.
No they don't.
If they are not uninstalled I get graphical glitches and performance
problems. The GL client and server versions differ. I suppose that's
because they're both in the linker path
Possibly a packaging bug... but IMO, not caused by the presence of
Mesa_GL. again, report it: