Hello, Alexander.
Sorry to bring back an old e-mail, but it seems there were no replies.
On Saturday, 26 August 2017 at 22:50, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
[...]
I have checked if there are any packages at the moment that require
liborigin* or liborigin*-devel and I have found none (though I'd be
grateful if someone who feels more at ease with dnf could
double-check). If not for this divergence, I would submit scidavis and
liborigin3 for review as separate packages, with Provides & Obsoletes
for the previous liborigin* and liborigin*-devel versions and be done
with it. However I would have to use the unbundled copy from SciDAVis
as source for liborigin3. Should I proceed with that anyway or should
I keep it bundled until such time as the two codebases have merged?
If there are no other consumers of SciDAVis' liborigin, I'd keep its
copy bundled and stay with upstream for the regular liborigin package
(assuming it has consumers). If there are no liborigin consumers other
than SciDAVis, I'd just orphan current liborigin after adding the above
explanation to a README file in the git repo.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan