On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 17:59, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Shrug, he's not alone in that. I was against *mandating* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
It's not mandatory. It just happens to be in the specfile templates as
well as recommended in the QA checklist because of its "official" status
according to jbj's comments.
Well, it used to be mandatory and all the QA checklist still require it.
It can't be more mandatory than that imo. I guess someone has to remove it
from the Wiki then ;)
-- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com,
http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]