I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
- the Java change should not be seen as part of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval - the Java change was written without knowledge of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval - the Java change should be considered separately from Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval - learning about Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval has not given the Java change owners any reason to change or reconsider this proposal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:08 PM Jiri Vanek jvanek@redhat.com wrote:
Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody from JDK maintainers beeing aware. Still ti remains valid.
What do you mean with "This java proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody from JDK maintainers beeing aware."? The JDK maintainers were not aware of this Java-related proposal? How can that be?
Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure