But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn&#39;t English.<div>Note: IANAL<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Matt McCutchen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:matt@mattmccutchen.net">matt@mattmccutchen.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:<br>
&gt; i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn&#39;t see any explicit reference<br>
&gt; to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.)<br>
<br>
</div>Indeed.  For an MIT licensing regime to be considered &quot;free&quot;, the<br>
original author must provide the source.  But being non-copyleft, the<br>
license does not require distributors of derived works to provide<br>
source.<br>
<br>
I can&#39;t imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I<br>
believe this is a non-issue.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Matt<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>