On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:30 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
As Jakub pointed out, there is a burden - having to wait for
the slower
arches to complete a build. I was under the impression that that was
one
of the main things that secondary arches was intended to fix.
Couldn't we have automatic ExcludeArch bug filing when a build
fails on
a secondary arch?
I think that just having a tool that keeps track of who is behind (a
build buddy system, if you will?) is probably enough and let package
maintainers and arch experts figure out the issues.
--Chris