On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:44 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27 2021 at 11:04:01 PM -0800, Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> For me this seems like kind of a non-starter unless these are merged
> upstream. I do not think it makes sense for Fedora to carry these
> patches downstream long-term. If this is a good implementation of a
> good feature, it should be merged upstream. If it isn't, we shouldn't
> carry it downstream.
Yeah let's start by getting the code upstream, that would be step one
before proposing a Fedora change proposal.
I'm fine with the Change proposal being made, as it gives us a
holistic view of things. We can always pre-condition it on the code
being upstreamed and then proceed with the rest of the enablement.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!