On Apr 23, 2016 09:18, "Florian Weimer" <fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>
>>> "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to
imagine
>>> people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation
>>> experience, after all.
>>
>>
>> The question, I think, is how much we want to prioritize the
>> "Workstation experience" on older hardware (or on devices like the
>> Baytrail tablets).
>
>
> Just to this point - if we wanted to support the Baytrail tablets
> properly we should probably get 64-on-32 working. Allowing 32-bit UEFI
> installs probably isn't something we want to do officially.
Has this changed due to IoT?
I am not sure there has been a very large amount of people interested in
doing the work or looking at IoT on i386 since the majority of the hardware
is arm and has no eufi