On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:25 -0700, stan via devel wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:22:12 -0700
stan via devel <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100
> Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case,
> > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against
> > fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora
> > 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
> I hit 124 issues. I have attached the dnf output. That's a lot of
> bugzillas to open; is there a better way?
When I looked at them, there were a lot of python2 problems. Since it
is going away in F32, I just deleted them as problems.
Those are exactly the 'problems' we're trying to detect, though. Python
2 packages don't just go away by magic, unless you pass --allow-erasing
, which can potentially lead to things being removed you didn't
actually want to be removed. They ought to be obsoleted properly. The
reason Miroslav is asking people to run these commands is to identify
packages - including Python 2 packages - which *should* be properly
obsoleted but are not, among other issues.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net