On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:10:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
I drafted a process to cover the evaluation of "Important
bugs" [1].
It still needs some work on the wording, however it should be good
enough for review and comments. May I ask for a feedback and possibly
improvement proposals, please ?
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Important_bugs_a...
This looks excellent to me as a first pass. We can adjust as need be as
we go. I'm a little worried about sending the message that bugs that
don't make the list here aren't "important" to us in a wider sense...
maybe we want something more neutral like "Prioritized Issues"? I know
this is a little bikesheddy, but it'll be hard to change later.
Also, I'd like to add the criteria:
Issues eligible for this status would be those which do not
necessarily fail a release criterion but which have critical impact
on a Fedora Edition or on a council-approved Fedora Objective.
Issues may also be nominated from the Common Bugs list when they are
deemed by QA to have critical impact.
to the page somewhere.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader