----- Original Message -----
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:50 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah well I'm not so sure how you can actually expect that of the
> feature
> process given how utterly broken that is?
>
> For the first you are not obligated to participate in the feature
> process
> and even if you did what does the process categorize as an actual
> feature?
>
> And I propose that you start lowering your expectations since there
> is a
> proposal floating with FESCo where the main think is that they
> want to
> avoid voting on all features but just decide in details on the
> bigger
> scope/escalated ones to FESCo. The rest will be acked just by
> announcing
> them (and again - anyone can escalate it to FESCo)...
I have no idea where you're getting this information, but I haven't
seen
anyone suggest anything like that. There is a desire to make the
Feature
process actually worthwhile, but it has nothing to do with blindly
acking
features.
It's one think that was an outcome of me talking to a few FESCo
members - so it's definitely not FESCo decision and I did not talk
to everyone. I should really start on the actual proposal (and I
wanted to come with a real one, not just talking) but - the main
idea was to free FESCo hands by not having to approve every single
feature and have a time to spent more on the system wide/escalated
ones. Also the announcement is a part of better visibility of
proposed features as this seems does not work well (and yeah, there's
barrier as before the feature is approved by FESCo, it's just one
of a huge list of incompleted ones).
Although this does not solve a problem that some really big changes
does not go through the process at all as it's not mandatory (or
we do not have a way how to actually enforce it).
Jaroslav
josh
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel