On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
> - Critical Path Feature
> - Other Enhancement Feature
> - New Leaf Feature
We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained feature"
but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's
unlikely for the
feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for such a
feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version updates,
say).
Other thing is - these "Self contained features" could be
approved
implicitly once are announced on devel list (in cooperation with
Feature Wrangler). Features that requires integration etc. will be
still approved by FESCo, but idea is to offload amount of work from
FESCo so they can give more time to track these features. Not to
bother with leaf features or enhancements. And as these should be
very visible (thanks to announcement) anybody could escalate any
feature to the FESCo for discussion/explicit approval.
That's the idea, I promised my prposal delivered to FESCo before
Beta ;-) But you know, moving target....
Any suggestions are welcomed!
Jaroslav
> I think this is nice for presenting the list of features overall,
> actually,
> both on the web site and in the eventual release notes.
>
> I also still like the idea of some other basic checkbox options which
> encourage people to clarify the wider implications of the feature.
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>