On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:28 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
So far, the only actual arguments against this (specifically, the
above solution to the problem) I've heard is that it breaks being able
to configure /boot/grub2/grub.cfg by hand. But that's the idea behind
grub2, for better or worse. The documentation specifically tells you
NOT to edit that file, but to instead edit configuration in /etc.
Most of the other arguments raised in response to this seem to have
really been about grub2 itself, and if Fedora has to use it, so.. are
there any other thoughts on the actual matter at hand?
grub2-mkconfig is inherently a more 'destructive' operation than grubby,
is really my only thought. But I wouldn't mind the change much at all.
pjones' opinion would be the most valuable to have, I guess.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net