On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 12:15, Leigh Griffin <lgriffin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:55 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh,
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 11:30, Leigh Griffin <lgriffin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Thank you for your patience while the CPE Team worked through an incredible
number of requirements from multiple stakeholder sources. On Friday evening we announced
on the Community Blog our decision to adopt Gitlab as our Git Forge and to retain
pagure.io to ultimately hand over to the Community to maintain. It wasn't an easy
decision by any stretch of the imagination and we hope that the compromise that we are
striking will help to allow Pagure flourish and to give a choice of Forges for your usage.
I'm happy to field any questions or comments about this decision.
>
> My question is, where's the open conversation about the requirements
> gathered that you promised in the initial thread?
Hey Iñaki, we have had several rounds of open conversation facilitated via the Council
threads on it to arrive on what the requirements were for the Fedora Project. This
ultimately concluded with the formal requirements received from the Fedora Council which
were shaped by the Community.
For transparency, we have published the full User Story list which is linked within the
blog and for ease of searching is here:
https://hackmd.io/@My419-DISUGgo4gcmO1D6A/HJB74lcL8
This thread is also part of the open conversation on the decision.
I was referring to, and I was expecting, an open conversation about
the User Story list, an open analysis of the requirements list. In
other words:
1. Open conversation to gather requirements. Done.
2. Publication of User Story list.
3. Open conversation to discuss (2).
4. Publication of the final decision.
I was expecting (3), and it's missing.
Iñaki