Am 08.12.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Petr Spacek:
On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Start moving away from
>> split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
>
> Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home
> network then? Making the forward zone for
home.kraxel.org public would
> at least work, although I fail to see the point in having public dns
> records for private networks. Registering the reverse zone is never
> ever going to work though ...
For the record, this is an invalid example.
Special-use domain names are listed in IANA registry
http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-doma...
what is there invalid?
*
rhsoft.net is my public zone
*
rhsoft.net is also my internal DNS zone
* there is no point calling my smart-tv "tv.example.com"
instead "tv.rhsoft.net"
* there is also no point to add a 192.168.x.x record in public DNS
* there is also no point calling my devices something.test
* .local shouldn't be used (look in the samba list-archives)
not that i am affected by any network changes Fedora decides since my
local DNS server will always be a full featured BIND forwarding any
non-lan zones over VPN to the comapany nameservers where i also control
the internal and external DNS views, but there are *millions* of valid
use-cases for split-DNS